Home > Mortgages > Homes Getting More Expensive, More Consumers Buying

Comments 0 Comments

Homes Getting More Expensive, More Consumers BuyingThough the national housing market has seen prices improve dramatically in the last year or more, consumers still seem more interested in buying properties, and both trends continued into the month of February.

The volume of sales made in the month of February improved on both a monthly and annual basis, as did the value of those transactions in general, according to the latest National Housing Report issued monthly by real estate giant Re/Max. The number of transactions rose 2.3 percent on a year-over-year basis, and was up 0.9 percent from January, while median prices surged 7 percent to $160,500. That was up from just $149,945 in February 2012, as well as a 3.5 percent improvement from January’s numbers.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

“It’s clear that the housing recovery is real and is moving full-speed ahead into 2013,” said Margaret Kelly, CEO of Re/Max. “Consumers recognize that we’ve hit the bottom, and real estate is offering some great opportunities with low prices and low interest rates. This is an attractive combination that most of us will never see again in our lifetimes.”

Free Credit Check & MonitoringThe rise in transaction numbers was driven largely by 29 of the nation’s 52 largest housing markets, where double-digit increases were observed on an annual basis, the report said. This was led by Boise, where sales climbed 21.6 percent, and followed by Burlington, Vermont, Las Vegas and Phoenix, with increases of 15.4, 14.1 and 14 percent, respectively.

Meanwhile, only four major metropolitan areas across the country saw prices shrink in February, with Los Angeles seeing the biggest depreciation in annual values at 8.7 percent, the report said. Hartford wasn’t far behind at 7.2 percent, while Trenton (3 percent) and Anchorage (2.1 percent) saw declines that were more modest. On the other hand, year-over-year increases in the double digits were seen in 21 markets, and 48 saw increases overall. Atlanta led the way for all these improving areas with an increase of 50 percent.

Further, with the volume of transactions rising annually, the average number of days homes spent on the market took a significant tumble, falling to 89 days from the 103 seen in February 2012, the report said. However, that was also up from 87 days in January.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]

It’s believed the housing market will continue improving over the next year at least, though those steps forward will likely be far more modest than the ones observed in the last 12 or 15 months.

Image: Jupiterimages

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team