Home > Personal Finance > Financial Meltdown in Cyprus: Could it Happen Here?

Comments 1 Comment

Though we may be getting desensitized to European bailouts and the prospect of more of them, the recently proposed — and currently rejected — bailout in Cyprus is perhaps more likely to give us pause. The proposed European Union bailout of as much as $13 billion was offered with certain strings attached: namely that Cypriot bank deposits would be hit with a tax of either 6.75% or 9.9% depending on the amount of money in the account. The proposal was not received particularly well by the citizens of Cyprus.

“Politicians and senior bank bosses have covered each other’s backs for years, now it’s ordinary people who are paying the price and are being punished,” Christos Demetriades, 58, told the Associated Press outside a shuttered bank in Nicosia, Cyprus.

As word spread through Cyprus about the proposed bailout, citizens began lining up at banks to withdraw their money, and many banks closed. Though they’ve rejected the latest version of the bailout, the Cypriot Parliament will debate the proposal with the particular aim of protecting smaller depositors from having to pay the tax. Meanwhile, a scheduled bank holiday was extended from Monday through Wednesday.

Could This Happen to Us?

All of this has nevertheless led to speculation about whether a similar situation could befall Americans. If American banks were in trouble, could they impose a tax on depositors? More importantly, if everyone rushed to take their money out of the bank in order to avoid the tax, would banks and ATMs shut down, as many have in Cyprus?

According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, your money is safe and you shouldn’t worry.

“The FDIC’s core mission is to create stability in the banking system and to protect depositors’ savings,” said FDIC spokesperson David Barr. “During the current economic crisis, consumers have seen firsthand how the FDIC protects their money by swiftly making deposits available when a bank is closed. In the FDIC’s 80-year history, not a single depositor has ever lost a penny of insured money as a result of a bank failure. Our proven track record has helped prevent bank runs during some very difficult economic times.”

Indeed, the FDIC was created in response to the Great Depression in large part to prevent the kind of thing we’re seeing in Cyprus. The FDIC insures the deposits of up to $250,000 (up from $100,000 since the passage of Dodd-Frank).

What, however, would happen if the FDIC were to run out of money? There’s a mechanism for that too. Kathleen Day, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Carey School of Business who teaches a class in financial crises, says that in the event that the FDIC weren’t able to meet its obligations, the Federal Reserve would step in and provide the funds.

“At a time of crisis…the Federal Reserve Bank is the lender of last resort,” she explains. “The irony is that by ensuring that people can get their money, people don’t line up to get their money. It’s only when there is a problem that they line up. But the U.S. government is never going to let that happen.”

Is That an Airtight Guarantee?

There are some considerations for depositors worried about the safety of their money, however. Let’s assume a bank fails and it’s either not covered by the FDIC or certain accounts contain more than the $250,000 limit. Could these depositors lose the uninsured money? Beyond that, let’s also consider what could happen if lots of banks needed to be bailed out. Could the government step in and tax deposits on everyone to pay for a portion that bailout, as has been proposed in Cyprus?

“There is no legal right to tax deposits in this country, and it would take a law change. I suspect that would be true in almost every country, and was apparently the case in Cyprus,” explains Ed Yingling, partner at Covington and Burling, and former CEO of the American Bankers Association.

Yingling explains that in the United States, the FDIC sells banks that have failed and when that happens, “Uninsured depositors can take a loss, the size of which depends on the value the FDIC gets for the assets of the bank. In reality, this seldom happens… However there are isolated cases, some recently, where depositors over the insurance limit have taken a loss.”

Pay Now… or Pay More Later?

For some, however, the idea that depositors might have to take a “haircut” as some call it, is not necessarily a bad thing.

“It’s completely incentive compatible,” says Joseph R. Mason, Professor of Banking at Louisiana State University, and a fellow at The Wharton School of Business. “This was the way banks would resolve themselves in the great depression. They would close down, make the depositors take a haircut, and then open a new bank which would buy the assets of the old bank at market value, and the depositors would often deposit their money into the new bank.”

[Related Article: The Ultimate Credit Report Cheat Sheet]

Mason also explains that banks have three types of asset-holders: bank stockholders, bank bondholders, and finally bank depositors. When a bank fails, the assets are liquidated and sold off in that order, meaning that the depositors should be the last to have to take a haircut. In the case of Cyprus, Mason believes that the haircut is likely the best option. Barring the bailout, many banks could fail and their assets could be liquidated. That process could take years.

“So what do you prefer,” Mason asks. “Ninety cents on the dollar now, or 60 cents on the dollar years from now?”

Image: Jupiterimages

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • TThor

    For sure. It happened in ’35 when they basically confiscated gold. And ever since then inflation has been systemic confiscation. 2 cents then is a dollar now….

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team