Home > 2013 > Credit Score

Are Mistakes Ruining Your Credit Report?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 3 Comments

A long-awaited study on credit reporting accuracy was released Monday and is drawing lots of attention — and some industry ire. In the FTC study, which tracked 1,001 individuals as they reviewed 2,968 credit reports and tried to correct mistakes, one in five consumers reportedly found errors on their credit reports, some of which could affect their credit scores.

The release of the study coincided with a report on CBS News’ 60 Minutes, titled, “40 Million Mistakes: Is Your Credit Report Accurate?” The report instigated a heated response from the credit reporting industry that accused the program of “selectively hyp(ing) snippets” from the report to “sensationalize the issue.”

What does this mean: Should you be worried that your credit report contains serious errors? Or not?

Despite headlines and hype to the contrary, the findings don’t appear to be too far off from a finding in an early study by the Policy and Economic Research Council, often referred to as the “PERC study” by the credit reporting industry. That study found that just under one in five (19.2%) of the credit reports examined by consumers were found to contain potentially inaccurate information.

However, in the PERC study, almost half of those alleged errors related to inaccurate header information (incorrect name of employer or misspelled street name, etc.) — information they emphasize has absolutely no effect on credit scores. The FTC reported that errors in the data on header information comprised the third most common category of alleged mistakes in their study.

The FTC reports that four out of five consumers who filed disputes experienced some modification to their credit report. And the Consumer Data Industry Association, which represents the credit reporting industry, says that three out of four consumer disputes are handled within 14 days. Again, they are looking at slightly different things here, but overall it doesn’t paint a dismal picture.

Both the FTC and PERC studies tackled the issue of the seriousness of mistakes, and how they impact consumers’ credit scores (and by extension perhaps the cost of credit). The FTC report found that of the 211 reports with a score change, 62 reports (29% of reports with a score change) had a score increase of more than 25 points. That’s similar to the PERC study’s finding that only .93% of all the credit reports examined had one or more disputes that resulted in a credit score increase of 25 points or greater. That latter report also found that an average of .5% of reviewed credit reports had modifications resulting in a credit score increase that placed the consumer in a high credit score tier where they would have likely received more favorable terms (a lower interest rate, for example).

What Does No Investigation Mean?

The CDIA took umbrage with the statement in the “60 Minutes” piece that the credit reporting agencies are “not doing an investigation at all,” and points out that credit reporting agencies are required by law to investigate all disputes promptly. But that assertion can’t be completely dismissed, either. Whether an investigation takes place depends on whether you define the term in just a strictly legal sense.

What a consumer thinks an investigation should involve and what actually happens may be worlds part. (Or countries apart; the “60 Minutes” piece included credit reporting agency representatives from Chile and India.)

Most consumers probably think an investigation means someone is reading the information they send in about their dispute, and then contacting the source of that data to try to determine the truth. Instead, most credit report disputes are handled by an automated system, eOscar, where disputes are turned into codes and the process most often involves computers talking to each other, rather than individuals. Typically in that system whatever the “furnisher” (lender, court, collection agency, etc.) says is correct determines whether the information is changed or not.

The automated system can be very efficient and takes care of the majority of disputes just fine: The PERC study reported that 98% of consumers were satisfied with the dispute process.

But neither study delved into the dark world of credit report purgatory, where consumers whose credit reports don’t get fixed, due to identity theft, mixed files or lenders whose records are wrong.

Should You Fear Credit Report Mistakes?

Back to the question posed earlier: Should you be worried about serious mistakes in your credit reports?

Of course you should. Whether it’s 2%, 5% or 20% of reports that contain errors serious enough to create a problem, you’ll never know which camp you fall into unless you check your credit reports yourself. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently reported that fewer than one in five consumers review their credit reports each year. Considering that everyone is entitled to at least one copy from each major agency each year, that’s pretty pathetic. Are the rest simply assuming things are OK, or perhaps too worried what they will find?

You won’t get your credit scores for free unless you are turned down or charged more for credit or insurance due to your credit score. But you can use a service like Credit.com’s Credit Report Card to get a free credit score once a month.

You’ll want to dispute credit report mistakes right away, and keep good records of the dispute process to maximize the chance that your problem will be resolved quickly.

If you’re reviewing your credit reports at least once a year and monitoring your credit scores regularly a shocking headline about credit reports won’t throw you for a loop because you’ll know exactly what that means for you.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Dona Collins

    Oh! Checking your credit report every year is SO important. I took it for granted for a very long time and I’m lucky there weren’t more mistakes. My report did have errors, though, including showing closed accounts as open and showing an account that did not belong to me at all. If I recall correctly, the one account belonged to my mother! It took a bit of effort on my part, but I had things corrected. Now I check my report annually, without fail!

  • Pingback: This Week in Credit News: The Truth About Report Errors | Credit.com News + Advice()

  • Pingback: How Fast Can You Rebuild Your Credit? | Credit.com News + Advice()

  • http://credit.com James Douglas

    Last year my ex and I went back to court over our normal 3 year review for child support, I knew my child support would go up as I am making more money now than I was three years ago, after the precedings my child support went up as expected , I wasn’t worried at all about it because the child support always comes directly out of my paycheck each week, ( been employeed at the same job for years). This year i went to the bank to get a loan and they said my credit wasn’t good enough , shockingly I asked what was on it, they said late child support payments dropped my score over 100 points, I think that this is crazy because the attorney general tells my employer how much to take out each week. Even though money had still been coming out each week ,the attorney general failed to tell my employer the new, correct amount for 3 months after the procedings, so they reported it to the credit bureu as deliquent payments . Can I dispute this as wrong, because I paid each week and have never been behind on my child support. Any and all info is greatly needed and appreciated. Thanks a concerned dad

    • Gerri Detweiler

      James – I would definitely suggest you dispute this. I am afraid it may be difficult to straighten out because of the source of the error but I owuld suggest you give it a try. I’d try disputing with the credit reporting agencies in writing, and include whatever proof you can that the payments were automatically being deducted from your account. If they confirm that the information is correct (which they may) then you’ll have to go to the attorney general’s office. If they won’t correct it, then try your state representative or Senator (at the state level – not in Washington) as they often have staff members who help constituents unsnarl problems with government agencies. Keep good records of every conversation and piece of correspondence. Fingers crossed it gets straightened out for you!

  • Pingback: This Week in Credit News: The Truth About Report Errors ← WORLD NEWS()

  • Pingback: How to Get the Most Out of Free Credit Reports | Best Credit Repair()

  • Pingback: How to Get the Most Out of Free Credit Reports | Credit.com Blog | how to get your Credit Report()

  • Pingback: Military Personal Finance Roundup: February 11-15 | Veterans United Network()

  • Pingback: 5 Simple Ways to Rebuild Your Credit | Best Credit Repair()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team