Home > Personal Finance > Welcome to the Fiscal Blip. Demand More in 2013

Comments 0 Comments

If there ever was such a thing as a fiscal cliff, most Americans will tell you that they fell off it around 2008. But that’s not what our politicians would have you believe, and the political theater to which we’ve all been subjected over the past few weeks is clear evidence of that. In what many Democrat pundits are trying to spin as white-flag politics, it would appear the so-called “fiscal cliff” deal is done. Each side will spin the merits, or lack thereof, for the purposes of the overblown shadow play that we witnessed over the holidays. The reality, however, is that the difference between right and left is insignificant when you consider the kind of money that some people are making these days in the more rapacious sectors of our economy.

At least during the debates about the Credit Card Reform Act and Dodd-Frank, the opposing sides were the citizenry vs. the financial corporations. What we’re dealing with here is harder to define. That’s because the fiscal cliff is in no small way a histrionic and hysterical method of framing budgetary issues by way of bully non-choices: Want a weakened military? Higher taxes for the middle class? How about a double-dip recession? While we’re at it, when did you stop beating your partner? The fiscal cliff is unsolvable by design. The real problem here is that people are calling this a done deal, when in fact it is a non-deal deal.

The misguided (unprincipled?) compromise of 2011 that created it must be seen for the train wreck of congressional leadership that allowed it to happen. In no small measure, we’re in this mess not just because of a “crisis” around debt or Medicare. We are in this mess because of an identity crisis. Too many lawmakers have gotten elected with too much corporate backing, and as a result a board room mentality has metastasized throughout a budget process that theoretically depends on the checks and balances of power that allegedly define the collective “process” that is our elected representation in Washington. So in one way, we’re to blame by voting for the best corporate-sponsored marketing campaign.

The fiscal cliff is ultimately about banks, desperate to maintain the unsustainable profits created by the mortgage boom, selling mortgages to people who could not afford them. It’s about balloon payments and adjustable interest rates, time bombs disguised as mortgages. It’s as if Donald Trump secretly took over the banking industry — and as a result a casino culture that is all flash and no substance prevails. The fiscal cliff is the bully’s threat — and the above financial FUBAR is what the bully is trying to protect. It is not about whether the middle class tops out at $250,000 a year or $450,000, since most members of the middle class would be euphoric to earn such income.

Citizens United is not the moment we placed corporations’ rights over those of actual human beings. The Supreme Court’s decision capped a decade-long process of corporate empowerment. Now, these same corporate interests (through their purchased representatives in Congress) have manufactured a bogus fiscal cliff in the cynical hope that they can foist even more responsibility off their ledgers and onto the backs of America’s non-rich.

[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free before applying for a credit card.]

The “cliff” is a metaphorical illusion — a political construct. Forget the narrow confines of its binary problem (tax breaks for the rich vs. continuing insurance for the unemployed), a political problem allows for a creative, political solution. We should use this fake, ginned-up “crisis” to our advantage and solve the real problems faced by real Americans. We should demand that that happens.

It could be that the answer to what ails America economically is rewarding companies that operate with a healthy reality principle like the Triple Bottom Line system of accounting where decisions are predicated by the “Three P’s:” Profit, People and Planet. Whatever we do, it’s time for the country to age out of the fake value, paper-billionaire age and start looking for ways to create real value for investors, workers and the nation.

As the novelist Edward Abbey famously wrote, “Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of a cancer cell.” We’ve all spent too much time in the casino culture that created the fiscal cliff to simply walk away from it unscathed. It’s the way of the house, which makes a bundle whether you lose money or not. The fiscal cliff is a scary way of framing the fact that we need a mid-course correction in this country with regard to the way we do business in Washington and everywhere else in the country.

One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. It seems sane to refuse to have the same corporations that caused this mess (or the lawmakers who represent them exclusively at the expense of taxpayers) dictate our options for solving it. It’s time to call their bluff.

[Credit Cards: Research and compare credit cards at Credit.com]

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: Ombeline_v, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team