Home > Personal Finance > CFPB Ombudsman: Complaint Process Needs Improvement

Comments 2 Comments

The federal watchdog agency intended to help consumers find more protections from potentially harmful financial practices has largely been helpful in better informing borrowers of their various obligations, but an official whose job it is to provide oversight for the organization itself says more can be done.

If the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had one overarching problem in its first year of full regulatory power, it was that in many cases its constituents may not have been given enough of an understanding about the various processes it has in place to protect them, according to the first annual report from Wendy Kamenshine, the agency’s ombudsman. Her office began operations some 10 months ago, and in that time received 775 inquiries from consumers, business people, lawyers, the media, lawmakers and government employees. In all, 80 percent of these submissions came from individual borrowers.

Of those inquiries, about 40 percent were related to the ways in which the agency deals with consumers’ complaints, the report said. Most were generally related to a lack of understanding they had about the process through which their filings went, and, therefore, the ombudsman’s office recommended that the CFPB can do more to clarify these situations so that borrowers have a more complete understanding of how their complaints are handled. For instance, some consumers said they did not understand the timeframes with which they were dealing once they submitted a complaint, such as how long it would take to review, or issue a judgment, and also that they did not know what to expect from each step.

One of the ways in which the ombudsman recommended greater clarity to the complaint process is by making sure to share more information with the public through various channels, the report said. Further, it needs to do a better job in giving transparency to when exactly the agency can and cannot help consumers with the complaints they might have about bank and nonbank financial institutions.

The CFPB has wielded full regulatory power over many lenders and other organizations involved in the financial system for more than a year, but is still expanding its purview to make sure that consumers are protected in as many parts of the various financial aspects of their lives as possible.

Image: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • LONNIE

    I HAS BEEN TRYING TO GET CFPB TO HELP US GET MY MORTGAGE PAPER WORK STRAIGHT.THEY HAVE HAD MY PAPER WORK SINCE OCTOBER I KEEP CALLING ABOUT MY COMPLAINT THEY GAVE ME A NUMBER BUT I KEEP GETTING DIFFERENT STOREIS.SOME OF YOU TELL ME THAT YOU HAVE TO SET UP A INTER NET FOR THE PEOPLE THAT I AM COMPLAIITING ABOUT AND THEN ICALL AGAIN AND YOU GUYS SAY YOU HAVE NOT GOTTEN A REPONSE FROM THE PEOPLE .SOME ONE FROM OMBUDSMAN CALL ME AND SUPPOSE TO HAVE GOTTEN BACK WITH ME LAST WEEK AND I HAVE NOT HEAR FROM THEM EITHER.COULD SOME ONE PLEASE HELP US WITH THIS.YOU GUYS ARE NOT DOING WHAT YOU SUPPOSE TO DO FOR US I AM A CONSUMER.

  • Deanna Templeton

    Hi Lonnie – I think you’re confusing Credit.com with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). To make sure your message gets to the right person, you’ll need to contact the CFPB directly. To file a complaint with the CFPB, visit http://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/

    And to check the status of a complaint that you’ve already filed (which it looks as though you have), you’d need to login here: https://help.consumerfinance.gov/app/utils/login_form/redirect/account%252Fcomplaints%252Flist

    Please keep us posted and let us know how things go.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team