Home > Identity Theft > Give Your Health Records a Checkup

Comments 0 Comments

By Lisa Eramo

It’s a scenario that nobody wants to admit could happen to them: medical identity thieves stealing your personal health insurance information to obtain medical treatment, fill prescriptions, and even undergo surgery. However, the harsh reality is that medical identity theft is a growing problem nationwide.

Approximately 1.85 million Americans were affected by medical identity theft in 2012—up from 1.49 million in 2011, according to the Third Annual Survey on Medical Identity Theft published by the Ponemon Institute, LLC in June.

Medical identity theft often occurs long before victims even become aware that their personal and health information has been compromised. Roughly 34 percent of survey participants said they found out about the theft one year or later after it occurred.

Medicare beneficiaries are at high risk for medical identity theft because their health ID numbers are directly connected to their Social Security numbers. When the theft occurs, these beneficiaries have few remedies from which to choose. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) published a report in October titled CMS Response to Breaches and Medical Identity Theft that highlighted the fact that Medicare beneficiaries with compromised numbers are not routinely assigned new numbers and that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) won’t eliminate Social Security numbers from Medicare beneficiaries’ numbers. The CMS cites high costs and operational challenges as barriers. The OIG report also states that there is no standard procedure for ensuring that beneficiaries retain their access to services if their Medicare numbers have been misused by others.

Why should all consumers care about medical identity theft? If a thief uses your identity to get medical care, his or her medical information (e.g., blood type, test results, allergies, etc.) will be added to your record. This could adversely affect your own treatment, safety and outcomes. If thieves repeatedly use your health insurance information, you may quickly reach caps that limit the services and medical devices that you’re eligible to receive. When you try to make a legitimate health insurance claim, your health plan may deny coverage once the caps are met.

Medical identity theft is an invasion of privacy. Thieves who breach your data could expose your personal health information on publicly accessible websites that don’t require authentication, making your private details easy targets for search engines, insurance companies or prospective employers.

The good news is that there are several ways in which you can monitor your health records proactively to ensure that nobody else has used or abused your ID. Consider the following:

Closely monitor any Explanation of Benefits (EOB) or bills that your health insurer sends to you. Do your bills correspond with the services you received, or do any services look suspicious? Review your EOBs carefully instead of simply tossing them in the trash with the junk mail. Be on the lookout for any charges related to medical services, office visits or medical equipment that don’t apply to you.

Request and monitor your credit report. Does your report include medical collection notices you don’t recognize? If so, an identity thief may have used your name, SSN and insurance information to obtain these services.

Request an accounting of disclosures report from your providers and health plan. This report, which consumers should request annually when they ask for a copy of their free credit report, includes a record of what information your provider disclosed, when it was disclosed, why it was disclosed, and to whom it was disclosed. Consumers have a right to this information under HIPAA.

In it, you’ll find a summary of disclosures made for public health purposes, most law enforcement activities, and health oversight activities, says Chris Apgar, CISSP, CEO and president of Apgar & Associates, LLC. What you won’t find is a history of disclosures made for treatment, payment, health care operations, and any other authorized releases—areas where a lot of the fraudulent activity could be occurring, Apgar says. Proposed federal regulations may require providers who use electronic health records (EHR) to include all disclosures in the report—regardless of why the disclosures were made. However, the Office for Civil Rights hasn’t announced when or whether it will finalize the requirements.

If your provider uses an electronic health record (EHR), a better option may be to ask for a copy of the EHR access log. Although providers aren’t required to give this information, persistent patients may be able to obtain it. The access log provides a detailed record of access and modification to your records. “They may not be pretty, but they contain considerably more about how protected health information is used and disclosed,” says Apgar. “They’re a much better way to track what could be fraudulent activity.”

Monitor your health plan’s website. Many health plans offer websites that consumers can access to monitor claims payment activity. For example, Medicare beneficiaries can access their Medicare-related information 24/7 on MyMedicare.gov,  a free, secure online service. Checking the site regularly helps arm you with up-to-date information so you can stop identity thieves in their tracks more quickly, says Apgar.

Essential resources

Lisa A. Eramo is a freelance writer and editor who specializes in healthcare regulatory topics, health information management, and medical coding. You may reach her at leramo@hotmail.com.

Image: Lars P., via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team