Home > 2012 > Managing Debt

Women More Likely to Take Out Payday Loans

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Bonnie faces a lot of problems. She is disabled and depressed, with a heart problem and high blood pressure. In the middle of it all, she’s getting hounded with calls about her payday loans.

“I have some payday loans I can not pay. They are calling every day with threats, and they are calling my daughter every day,” a Credit.com reader named Bonnie wrote to us recently. Given all her other problems, “This is not helping me at all. Please help me.”

Women like Bonnie have dominated the Presidential campaign this week as Mitt Romney and Barack Obama trade barbs on who will do a better job helping women. Gov. Romney and Rep. Paul Ryan have stressed in campaign events that a weak economy under President Obama has forced poverty rates among women to a 17-year high. Meanwhile, the President argues that his support for child care tax credits and equal pay legislation make him the better choice.

As the debate over women in the economy rages, a little report from the attorney general of Colorado puts the issue is stark relief. According to the report, women make up a majority of payday loan customers, year after year. In 2011, 53 percent of all payday loans were taken out by women, compared to 47 percent by men. At the height of the Great Recession, the disparity was even larger. More than 55 percent of payday loan customers were women in 2008, and 45 percent were men.

That could pose problems for some, since people who borrow from payday lenders face annual interest rates of up to 45 percent, the cap set by Colorado law. When added to service and finance charges, that leaves the average payday loan borrower paying $235.97 on an average loan of $330.

It’s also a problem, consumer advocates say, because women who borrow from payday lenders in Colorado earn about $2,300 a month in gross income, or $330 less than the average man, according to the report.

“When caught in the payday lending trap, these women and their families are stripped of their hard-earned income at the time they need it the most, resulting in real hardships for their families,” according to a survey of research on payday loans by the Center for Responsible Lending.

While the issue of payday lending has not figured prominently in this year’s election cycle, Barack Obama did talk about it during the 2008 race, when he promised “to cap outlandish interest rates on payday loans and to improve disclosure,” according to Politifact.com. While no such cap has been proposed by his administration, Obama did push for creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is taking its first steps toward writing rules that would police behavior by the largest payday lenders.

Since many of the bureau’s first proposed rules regarding mortgages and credit cards concerned improved transparency about the products’ terms, many observers believe that rules on payday lenders would also be focused on giving consumers better access to information.

Mitt Romney has promised to repeal the Dodd-Frank Act, which created the consumer bureau, and he has blasted the bureau as “perhaps the most powerful and unaccountable bureaucracy in the history of our nation.” Romney appeared to soften his stance toward increased financial regulation the during the first Presidential debate, however, making it unclear what changes he hopes to make regarding payday loan regulations, if any. He would “repeal and replace” Dodd-Frank, Romney said during the debate. “You have to have regulation,” Romney said. “And there’s some parts of Dodd-Frank that make all the sense in the world. You need transparency….”

Image: PinkMoose, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team