Home > 2012 > Credit Cards

Under Pressure, Credit Card Upsells Disappearing

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

When it comes to paying extra money for services from their credit cards, many Credit.com readers admit to having mixed feelings. Are things like debt protection, credit monitoring and identity theft protection valuable products? Or are they overpriced services that offer little real value? One reader whose identity was stolen twice now pays for an ID theft protection service. He wonders whether he needs more protection, and whether it’s worth the money.

“I have also considered using credit insurance, but the fees seem really exorbitant right now,” the reader said recently in response to a Credit.com story. “Sort of like buying a latte every day even though you should save that extra money.”

That indecision isn’t just happening to Credit.com readers. It’s affecting some of the nation’s largest banks, too. After years of offering a full range of credit card add-on services, the three largest banks are pulling back. Chase closed its debt protection plans to new enrollments this March, says Steve O’Halloran, a Chase spokesman.

Bank of America stopped offering credit monitoring services late last year, and closed down its debt protection and identity theft protection offerings in August, Betty Reiss, a BofA spokeswoman, told Credit.com. Also in August, Citi announced that it would stop selling debt protection services connected to its credit cards, says Spokeswoman Emily Collins. All of which leaves the banks in a staggered position, with some banks offering some add-ons, others not, while most continue to offer add-on products for existing customers but declining to sign up new cardholders.

New Guidelines

Spokespeople for Chase and BofA declined to say why their banks stopped offering add-on products. Citigroup was a tad more upfront. “(W)e decided to stop selling debt protection products as we complete reviews in light of new regulatory guidelines,” Spokeswoman Emily Collins said in an email.

What Collins is talking about is a major crackdown by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on allegedly deceptive practices used by some major credit card issuers to market and sell these add-ons. The bureau’s first-ever enforcement action, announced in July, found that Capital One deceived customers by claiming falsely that debt protection products would build their credit scores, neglecting to mention that the services were optional, and marketed add-ons to people who were ineligible (selling unemployment insurance to people who already were unemployed, for example). Capital One agreed to pay $140 million to two million victims, plus another $25 million in fines.

In October, the bureau reached another settlement, this time with American Express, finding that three of the company’s subsidiaries used deceptive marketing to sell add-ons, and used illegal age discrimination to disqualify certain potential customers, among other findings. American Express will pay $85 million to 250,000 customers, and $27.5 million in fines.

The bureau also sent a warning letter to financial institutions, telling them that federal regulators are now on the lookout for other companies that try to sell add-on products to customers using “deceptive promotional practices” and “failing to adequately disclose important product terms and conditions,” while enrolling people “in programs without their affirmative consent.”

What’s the Value?

All of that adds up to a lot of scrutiny for products that often fail to provide significant value to consumers, many credit industry analysts say.

“It’s well-known that many of these products have little value,” says Barry Paperno, a credit scoring expert and Credit.com’s community director. “Some of these products prey on people who don’t understand” the terms.

Some add-on products, such as credit monitoring, can be useful, especially for people like the recently divorced or victims of identity theft who worry that someone might try to hijack their credit, says Gerri Detweiler, Credit.com’s consumer credit expert.

Other add-ons such as debt protection, in which the credit card issuer promises to cover minimal balance payments if the cardholder becomes disabled or unemployed, for example, often come with so many fees and so many hidden barriers to collecting benefits that they often cost more than they give back, Detweiler says.

“I’m not a big fan of debt protection,” says Detweiler. “I can’t remember ever recommending that product to a consumer. Those plans are often too expensive for the little benefit they provide.”

How to Decide

How to tell the difference between a worthwhile credit card add-on service and one you should probably skip? Here are Detweiler’s three tips on how to decide.

1. Shop Around. Many consumers don’t think about buying products like debt protection or credit monitoring until they receive phone calls or marketing materials from their bank or credit card issuer. When confronted with the choice, and especially with some high-pressure sales tactics, many say yes right away.

That’s almost always a bad idea, Detweiler says. If this is your first time hearing terms like “debt protection,” that’s a good signal to slow down. Maybe your credit card issuer really does offer the best plan out there. Maybe some other company does. Or maybe you don’t need the product at all. The only way to know is to investigate.

“Your best idea is to shop around and not automatically take what your credit card company is offering you,” Detweiler says.

2. Ask for details. Maybe your credit card issuer really does offer the best program. But you’ll only be able to tell by getting all the details, Detweiler says. Especially when it comes to insurance-like products, including debt protection, make sure that you are not automatically excluded because of your type of employment or pre-existing conditions. “If consumers really understand what they’re buying and they know they have a choice of where they can get that service, then I’m OK with offering it to them,” Detweiler says.

3. Stay on them. Since many add-on products cover events far in the future, such as loss of employment or inability to make minimum payments, it’s important to make sure that you keep track of the programs over time. If your issuer sends you paperwork with new terms and conditions, read it and tuck it into a file folder. If someday you need to redeem the services, make sure you follow the issuer’s instructions for how to claim benefits. And if you are unexpectedly denied, report the company to federal regulators including the CFPB. As we know from the bureau’s recent investigations and letters to the industry, federal regulators are on the lookout for abuses.

“Clearly, customers have to know what they’re getting into, and know that they can shop around for the product that’s right for their situation,” Detweiler says.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team