Home > Personal Finance > Swipe-Fee Settlement Sent to Judge for Final Approval

Comments 0 Comments

A proposed settlement between the world’s two largest processors of debit and credit card payments, and a number of merchant groups and major chains, is now awaiting two stages of approval from a federal judge.

The settlement, reached between 19 parties representing both merchant groups and major national retail chains, and both Visa and MasterCard, is now in the hands of U.S. District Judge John Gleeson in Brooklyn, New York, according to a report from Reuters. If approved, the deal would cause Visa and MasterCard to pay about $7.25 billion to the groups involved, in the form of both cash payments and temporarily reduced prices on the swipe fees they charge to merchants for processing debit and credit card transactions.

Of that, $6.05 billion would be paid directly, and the remaining $1.2 billion would come in lower swipe fees for several months, the report said. However, while some of the groups involved in the suit – and both Visa and MasterCard – have expressed support for the agreement, there remains a large group of plaintiffs that is staunchly opposed to it.

In particular, 10 of the 19 original parties to the suit – including the National Retail Federation and Wal-Mart Stores – say the deal is unfair for two reasons, the report said. First, it offers little in the way of an actual overhaul of the swipe fee structures under which merchants have to live, and second, the acceptance of the settlement would in turn lead to their losing the right to sue the two companies over swipe fees in the future, regardless of what they do.

“The lawyers and handful of retailers who support the settlement do not represent the retail industry,” Mallory Duncan, senior vice president and general counsel for the National Retail Federation, told the news agency.

Meanwhile, those who do support the settlement say that it gives them the meaningful ability to discuss with their customers the effects swipe fees have on businesses’ bottom lines, the report said. Visa and MasterCard have also come out in support of the approval of the settlement.

Some experts say that if this settlement is approved, it might increase prices for consumers who use certain credit and debit cards to complete purchases, which in turn can theoretically lead to more debt.

Image: Irish Typepad, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team