Home > Mortgages > Consumer Group Asks CFPB for End to Some Mortgage Rules

Comments 0 Comments

The federal watchdog agency in charge of protecting consumers’ finances recently proposed a number of rules for the ways in which mortgage lenders and servicers deal with borrowers, but one group thinks these regulatory changes could actually be harmful for Americans.

The consumer advocacy group Americans for Financial Reform, made up of a number of special interests including the AFL-CIO and NAACP, recently asked that the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau re-write some of its proposed mortgage servicing rules, according to a letter from the group. In particular, it believes the proposed rule changes related to how disclosures of home loan costs, and those related to how mortgage servicers handle consumers’ accounts, will actually be rollbacks of safeguards already in place.

“We appreciate the CFPB’s attention to the problems of homeowners, recognition of the need for uniform servicing standards to right the pervasive problems in the servicing system, and the steps in the proposal to increase transparency and responsiveness to homeowners,” the AFR’s letter said.

It also believes these protections simply aren’t strong enough to change the inherent problems in the foreclosure process and provide more security for borrowers who have been hit with financial difficulties, the report said. Further, unless consumers are fully aware of all the costs they may face during the course of the borrowing process, they may be more likely to enter into agreements they do not fully understand or cannot afford.

As such, the group would like the CFPB to pull back its current proposals, which have also been criticized by banking groups, and re-write them so that there is more clarity, specifically related to what documents and notifications mortgage servicing companies must provide to consumers at various stages of the borrowing process.

[Credit Cards: Research and compare credit cards at Credit.com.]

The CFPB has often received criticism from various sides of the argument on increasing consumer protections. However, it has generally worked well to increase safeguards for various types of credit, with a particular focus on credit cards, which tend to carry higher interest rates than most other loans and can therefore lead to far more debt problems in a shorter period of time. The agency has only had a full-time top executive for 10 months or so, as director Richard Cordray was only appointed to the job in early January.

Image: Images_of_Money, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team