Home > Personal Finance > 5 Ways Romney Will Roll Back Consumer Protections

Comments 4 Comments

Mitt Romney’s now-infamous statement, “My job is not to worry about those people,” pretty much sums up the Republican nominee’s true feelings about who he represents. And if you’re in serious debt, it doesn’t seem like he’s too worried about you, either.

If you are among the 22.4 million people who owe college debt, a record 20 percent of all American households, Romney makes clear that he represents big student loan companies, not you. If you are one of the 55.4 million households with credit card debt, the 77.7 million households, or the million people who lost their homes to foreclosure in the first half of 2012, Romney doesn’t worry about you, either. (After all, this is the guy whose answer to the foreclosure crisis is to do nothing, and just “Let it run its course and hit the bottom.”)

With the help of our Democratic leaders, the country is taking its first tenuous steps toward building a more transparent, truthful, equal, efficient and cheaper credit system, where the fee-happy mortgage chicanery that caused our current economic malaise is unambiguously illegal.

Candidate Romney promises that if elected President he would do everything in his substantial power to tear down that nascent system, returning us all to the Wild West-style laissez-faire practices that got us into trouble in the first place.

Here are five ways in which Romney would be devastating for everyday Americans.

1. Credit Cards Will Become More Expensive and Deceptive

For more than a year, Romney has been carping about the supposed harm caused by the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act, which passed with support of such diehard big bank apologists as (wait for me now) Mitch McConnell and Jim DeMint. Romney says the CARD act, “produced federal restrictions on credit card companies that have already led to higher interest rates, higher annual fees, and lower credit limits, especially for middle-class borrowers.”

He’s completely wrong. Interest rates and fees actually dropped immediately after the CARD Act took effect, according to the Federal Reserve. The reason is obvious: The CARD Act is doing a great job of protecting consumers from all kinds of abuses, including deceptive pricing schemes. Among its many features, the act prohibits raising rates on existing credit balances except in three very specific circumstances; requires credit card issuers to give cardholders 45 days’ notice before increasing interest rates; forbids the types of billing and payment shenanigans issuers once used to hike rates and reap exorbitant fees; limits issuers from charging more than one overdraft fee per month; forces issuers to gain cardholders’ explicit consent before signing them up for costly overdraft protection; and requires credit card companies to disclose to consumers how long it will take to pay off their balance by making only the monthly minimum payment. (Even this great law is a work in progress and has its problems, including loopholes that allow issuers to charge new, higher rates sooner and more often than advertised, as Credit.com covered here.)

If you have a credit card (or two, or three, or four), you’re benefiting from these reforms right now. But hey, Mitt Romney ain’t worried about you. He wants to gut this legislation based on his “pro-consumer automatically means anti-business” worldview. If he succeeds, banks will be allowed to regress to the good old days when they could increase fees and interest rates whenever they felt like it, manipulate your bill’s due date to grab overdraft fees and no doubt worse.

2. Predatory Mortgages Will Return

Romney hates the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act even more than he does the CARD Act (but less than the Affordable Health Care Act). Forget tweaking the law; he wants to get rid of it entirely.

“I’d like to repeal Dodd-Frank,” Romney said. “The extent of regulation in the banking industry has become extraordinarily burdensome following Dodd-Frank.”

If he succeeded, that would include the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act, which does many good things, including banning the old kickback system in which lenders paid bonuses to mortgage originators who hoodwinked homebuyers into paying higher interest rates. This law requires lenders to ensure that borrowers can actually afford a mortgage, making it more difficult for lenders to trick homebuyers into loans that are either inappropriate to their economic standing or costlier than advertised simply to reap the origination fees, a practice that helped cause the mortgage boom and bust. It bars lenders from forcing homeowners into bogus, industry-controlled arbitration programs (rather than seeking redress in the courts), and in a number of cases prevents lenders from charging pre-payment penalties when homeowners manage to pay their mortgages off early.

These reforms are vitally important, not just for homeowners, but also for honest lenders and the economy at large. They reaffirm the American notion that our economic system should be based on real work and real value, not on deception and trickery.

3. Student Loans Will Be More Expensive

Under the old system of higher education funding, the federal government used private lenders to dole out billions of dollars in student loans every year. The result was massive waste in the form of government subsidies to guarantee repayment or reimburse private companies when graduates deferred payment due to financial hardship, says Mitchell Weiss, a frequent Credit.com contributor and an expert on student loans.

In 2010, President Obama changed all that. By removing the private middlemen and making the Department of Education responsible for government loans, he saved taxpayers millions every year. He also pushed for and won legislation that caps graduates’ monthly loan payments at 10 percent of their incomes, gives borrowers more power to reduce their payments if their income drops, and gives them the opportunity to reduce or eliminate debt entirely if they commit themselves to careers that promote the public good. (For great background on all this, check out this summary by the New America Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank.)

Surprise! Romney wants to scrap all that. He proposes to get private lenders back into the lucrative game of government student lending, even though doing so would cost taxpayers and students billions extra in the form of subsidies and increased fees and interest charges, according to the Federal Education Budget Project.

What does Romney want struggling students to do instead? His considered plan: students should “shop around” for cheaper colleges.

That’s not a plan, it’s a downright insult.

4. Death to the CFPB

The true target of the Romney “corporations are people” crowd is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which he called “the most powerful and unaccountable bureaucracy in the history of our nation.”

Wrong again! Far from being some unaccountable attack dog, the CFPB is the only regulator of the financial industry whose decisions can be vetoed by other agencies. What’s more important is that in his quest to carry Wall Street’s sweat buckets and destroy the Bureau, Romney is willing to sacrifice the millions of hardworking Americans who just want a fair deal.

In its first year of existence, the Bureau already has proposed simple, easy-to-read disclosure forms that clearly explain in just one or two pages all the costs involved in a mortgage agreement or a credit card contract. That’s a huge improvement over current contracts, which sometimes prattle on for scores of pages and bury loads of hidden fees deep in the fine print.

If he succeeds in killing the CFPB, Romney’s Wall Street friends win. They get to keep loading us down with sneaky fees. And tens of millions of people with mortgages and credit cards lose.

5. More Exploitation by Payday Lenders and Debt Collectors

Anyone who’s ever run across these industries already knows what’s wrong. Payday lenders charge astronomically high interest rates, often between 400-700 percent, trapping low- and moderate-income families into a cycle of debt from which some might never escape. Every week seems to bring another scandal in which a debt collection company is caught illegally threatening consumers with jail time; revealing details about debts to neighbors and employers; and simply making up the paperwork required to prove in court that the consumer in question actually owes any debt at all.

It’s obvious that consumers need more transparency, education and protection from these deceptive practices, not less. Romney’s plan to kill the CFPB would stop those reforms after conception but before birth. Millions of vulnerable Americans will lose.

If you are ready for a president who believes that trickle-down economics is the answer to the problem of what to do in a global economy, and if you want the solution to look like an economic killing field where most of the country’s citizens are sacrificed on the altar of corporate greed of the very worst stripe, then by all means Mitt’s your guy.

Of course, I could be wrong. He could make things even worse.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: Mark Taylor, via Wikimedia Commons

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team