Home > 2012 > Mortgages

MegaBanks Finally Ready to Modify Mortgages… Don’t Miss Out!

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 6 Comments

Hell has frozen over! After years of lawsuits and investigations by federal and state law enforcement agencies — not to mention some hard-ass negotiations by the U.S. Department of Justice and 49 state Attorneys General (shout-outs to AGs Eric Schneiderman of New York, Beau Biden of Delaware, and Kamala Harris of California) — mortgage servicers are finally being forced to repay some of the billions of dollars they stole from American consumers. Unfortunately, the timing couldn’t be worse.

It’s all because of the National Mortgage Settlement, an agreement with federal and state law enforcement agencies in which the largest mortgage servicers agreed to refund $21.5 billion to consumers who were seriously harmed by deceptive servicing practices. They are also being forced to refinance many of these underwater mortgages, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

The problem is that consumers have become so mistrustful of financial institutions promising mortgage modifications, many assume the settlement will simply lead to more empty promises. In too many cases, their justified disgust for the big banks may be causing them to tune out the message and forfeit the fruits of their victory — however significant that turns out to be.

However, if you are a homeowner, please consider this your wake-up call because some of that $21.5 billion may actually belong to you.

Ever since the housing bubble burst nearly five years ago, pretty much everyone, anyone who wasn’t stuck on an ice floe or marooned on a South Sea island has figured out that fishy things were afoot in the world of mortgage servicing. Officially, servicers are merely the middlemen in the mortgage process. They open payment envelopes from homeowners, make sure that property taxes and insurance are paid and pass the remainder onto investors.

In reality, however, servicers wield tremendous power. The industry is dominated by megabanks and finance companies, including Citi, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Ally/GMAC. Here are a few of the abuses the big servicers are alleged to have committed, according to the lawsuit brought by the Department of Justice and 49 states:

1. When a homeowner fell behind on insurance payments (or, commonly, if the servicer failed to record that insurance was fully paid), these giant servicers can and did “force-place” home insurance, which is often exorbitantly expensive. Servicers also have almost sole discretion regarding when to modify a mortgage, and when to foreclose.

2. Servicers often failed to record mortgage payments, wrongfully forcing homeowners who were current on their payments into delinquency. They then proceeded to treat “delinquent” homeowners like their own personal piggybanks, reaping huge profits by charging outrageous fees for insurance, default, and even basic maintenance like mowing the grass.

3. Servicers wrongfully declined to modify the mortgages of people who qualified for such help under federal programs including the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Many foreclosed on those who were faithfully making payments as part of a trial loan modification arrangement.

4. Servicers’ paperwork was such a disaster they often lacked the documentation required to prove they had the right to service loans. So what did they do? A number of them fabricated documents, and presented the forgeries to courts as real (hiring temp workers to sign thousands of these phony documents each day — thereby giving the “robo-signing” scandal its name). This led to the ultimate scandal: Thousands of people were illegally evicted from their homes, according to a lawsuit filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, and stories by Credit.com including this and this.

Meanwhile, two-bit scammers flooded billboards, late-night TV, highway off-ramps and homeowners’ mailboxes with ads offering mortgage modifications. Many consumers jumped for the life raft but drowned in the process. Whether the offer came from a supposedly reputable megabank or Vinnie the Shark, the result was often the same: Lost money, foreclosed houses and broken dreams.

The National Mortgage Settlement could help to clean up this mess. It requires the five largest mortgage servicers to provide loan modifications and reduce the mortgage principal of millions of Americans by $17 billion, according to nationalmortgagesettlement.com, the website created by government regulators to help homeowners learn more about the settlement. Servicers were required to begin notifying homeowners of these changes by letter starting in June. If they fail to dole out all the relief to victims within three years, they could be forced to pay millions of dollars more in additional fines.

Servicers also must help borrowers who are current on their payments but whose loans are underwater by refinancing their loans with lower interest rates, saving homeowners another $3 billion. In addition, servicers must pay $1.5 billion to 750,000 borrowers who lost their homes to foreclosure between 2008 and 2011.

It sounds like a lot of money, and much of the settlement is a good start (I emphasize the word start), though $2,000 for a home that was illegally foreclosed upon seems pretty unconscionable to me.

That said, after years of wrongful conduct and denying help to millions of homeowners, the worm has turned and now the megabanks are under a hard deadline to pump out more than $21 billion to their victims.

Unfortunately, many homeowners are so tired of dealing with scammers of all sizes, and so cynical about the motivations of “too-big-to-fail” financial institutions, that what we have here is a “failure to communicate,” as Paul Newman said in his 1967 masterpiece film “Cool Hand Luke.” American Banker, for instance, recently took note of the widespread concern in the banking industry that many consumers are failing to respond to the banks’ new offers of help.

“There is a great deal of fatigue among borrowers looking to resolve their mortgage situation,” Eric Schuppenhauer, JPMorgan Chase’s mortgage servicing chief, told American Banker. The company is so worried, it’s paying extra to mail tens of thousands of letters via FedEx, hoping that will get consumers’ attention.

I have two very different reactions to this news.

On the one hand, I say: Finally! Consumers spent five years getting slapped around by mortgage servicers who broke the law. Now those guys are depending on the consumers they abused to meet a strict, do-or-die deadline. It’s refreshing to see the big boys sweat. Anyway, shelling out a few extra bucks for overnight shipping could help boost the earnings of fellow Fortune 100 companies Federal Express and UPS. That’s good for the economy, yes?

What bothers me is the idea that the people who suffered heartbreak and loss at the hands of these characters might never benefit from their own redemption. While it warms the cockles of my heart to see the would-be masters of the universe jumping through hoops trying to pay back their victims, it’s no joke for consumers to forfeit reparations. Cynical or not, those who fail to take mortgage servicers up on these loan modification and principal reduction offers are losing yet again.

Does the settlement fix all the servicing industry’s problems? Hell no. Servicers still operate with a fundamental conflict of interest, since they profit from foreclosures even when homeowners and investors lose. The servicers’ system for tracking property rights remains in utter chaos, leaving the door open to more perjury, wrongful foreclosures and evictions in the future. In short, former victims get some modicum of reparation; however, America’s mortgage market is still broken.

While these reparations are crucial, perhaps even equally important than the money involved, however, the settlement sends the message to America’s biggest banks that they can no longer treat regular Americans with utter disregard. When we make our monthly mortgage payments, we have the right to expect that we are building equity in our homes and saving for our futures, not padding the profits of a small segment of the financial elite that has repeatedly proven to be hapless, clueless and woefully bad at doing its well-remunerated job.

Normally in this space I advise folks to be wary of scams in the mail, including offers of loan modifications. Today I give the opposite advice. Pay close attention to the mail. When you see offers to improve your mortgage situation, open them. Read them. Some may be scams. But one may be a serious offer of meaningful financial support from a real mortgage servicer.

So, for just a moment, lay aside your cynicism. The good news is that for once you and your mortgage servicer are actually on the same side. Savor it. It may never happen again.

Image: raymondgilford.com, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Jane

    What options for refinance or modification are available for those of us who do not have Fannie May or GMAC or FHA loans? I have been told I do not qualify because I do not have a government backed mortgage loan.

    • Gerri Detweiler

      Jane –

      Individual lenders are still modifying mortgages. In fact, sometimes smaller lenders are doing a better job of it than the big banks!

      If you haven’t done so already, I would encourage you to talk with a HUD housing counselor and get a free housing counseling session. They may be familiar with options your lender is offering.

      Then, talk with your lender directly and see how far you get with them. It may take some serious persistence to get something that works for you, so don’t give up if you are rebuffed initially.

  • Pingback: The Most Outrageous Tax of the Year | ComparePlastic()

  • Pingback: The Most Outrageous Tax of the Year | Credit.com News + Advice()

  • Pingback: MegaBanks Finally Ready to Modify Mortgages… – Credit.com News … | Refinance With Poor Credit()

  • http://credit.com/newsandadvice deborah morrow

    i have tried 7 yrs to modify our mortgage. everything is going great until the appraisal is done and both times i have been told my home appraises for too much is that not crazy or what where do i go for help??

    deborah morrow

    • Gerri Detweiler

      Deborah –

      We wish we had a simple answer for you. Modifications can still be very difficult to get, even with this settlement. If you are eligible under the settlement, it’s likely to be a situation of “don’t call us, we’ll call you,” so watch your mail.

      Are you underwater on your home? (Meaning you owe more than it is worth?) If so, you may have to either just “stay and pay” and hope things improve or look into the other options I outline in my series: Underwater on Your Home? Your Six Options.

      • deborah morrow

        no the fact is i am not underwater but my payments are so high and we have had a tremendous loss of income the last 2 yrs that my credit is hurting and i am struggling to keep my scores up and my house is 35 yrs old and the appraisal value is right on but no one will help modify us because the appraisal they say is too much it only appraises for 10,000 more than i owe

  • Pingback: MegaBanks Finally Ready to Modify Mortgages… – Credit.com News … | Direct Software News Blog()

  • Susan Mitchell

    How should these settlements, both in terms of principal reduction and pay-outs, be treated for tax purposes? The IRS is sending 1099-MISC forms to folks receiving the settlements. Shouldn’t these payments be considered to be capital gain rather than income based on the nature of the original claim? I welcome your feedback!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team