Home > Managing Debt > Why Medical Collections Need an Overhaul

Comments 6 Comments

A good credit history takes years to build, and can be instantly destroyed when even a modest medical co-payment bill is sent to collection. Currently, American consumers have no effective redress if a medical bill is sent to collection and reported to the credit bureaus. Even if the bill sent to collection is promptly paid, or is in dispute, it can drag down a credit score. The Fair Isaac Corporation, which produces the FICO score, has said that medical collections may lower a score by “100 points or more” for someone with a spotless credit history.

Recognizing the financial problems caused by medical bills that appear on credit reports, U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Charles Schumer of New York, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Sherrod Brown of Ohio called on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to investigate medical collections.

At a recent hearing of the House Committee on Small Business, CFPB Director Richard Cordray made it clear that he would do so. Director Cordray was asked by Rep. Nydia Velazquez of New York whether the CFPB’s recent announcement that it would regulate credit bureaus would also include addressing medical debt on credit reports. His response revealed his intimate understanding of medical collection problems.

Cordray described delays in medical billing, insurance disputes, confusion regarding co-payment amounts, and acknowledged that it is a “hard issue” whether disputed insurance claims should be considered debt. He responded that the CFPB was “going to be overseeing and supervising the larger participants in the credit reporting industry.” Noting that the credit reporting companies keep consumer files on millions of Americans, Cordray went on to say, “We will be overseeing all of their approach to this, including medical debt.”

Quite possibly, the scrutiny of Congress and the CFPB will result in a review by the Consumer Data Industry Association of its policies and practices for reporting medical debt.

The Senators who have called on the CFPB to investigate medical debt have also introduced legislation to address this problem. They are sponsors of The Medical Debt Responsibility Act, a proposal that would amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act and require consumer reporting agencies to remove medical accounts from credit reports within 45 days of being fully paid or settled. To repeat, only medical accounts with a zero balance due would be removed from credit reports. Similar legislation has been filed in the U.S. House with strong bi-partisan support.

This legislative proposal would help millions of Americans who are now shut out of the affordable credit market due to medical collections that inaccurately portray them as risky consumers. It has the potential to save American consumers millions in dollars due to overpriced loans; money that could stimulate the economy by being spent on consumer goods. This multi-pronged approach — legislation and CFPB oversight of industry practices — may finally crack open the black box that the Consumer Data Industry Association does not want Americans looking into. Hopefully, Congress will act to pass the Medical Debt Responsibility Act AND the CFPB will further investigate the unfair practice of penalizing American who had the misfortune of having a medical bill sent to collection. Such scrutiny of the medical debt collection problem could not come at a better time.

Image: rosmary, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Marina

    It is about time somebody looks into the lousy and abusive medical billing practice. Why medical billers can’t bill patients in a timely manner; bill patients without even checking patient’s current info regarding secondary insurance; billing patients few days after the patient informs them he wants some copies of his medical records for another doctor to look at when the biller never sent a bill for several months or even a year. Overhaul is needed.

  • http://credit.com maria c. chambers

    The medical collection make you feel like they have total control over your livelyhood. And even when you paid off things on your credit they tell you things like we won’t can’t take this off your credit. I feel like the doctor are in arrangement with these collection agencies.

  • Brian Graef

    I had a devasting heart condition diagnosed in May 2011. I had a clean bill of health and had regular physicals. I even had a EKG on my heart a few years before this incident and was told that I had a good heart. Since the incident happened in May, I had to have open heart surgery for a heart condition that is hereditary. I lost my job due to the condition. The hosp did not have a contract with the ins company, eventhough it was one of my providers on my insurance. They nailed me with unusual and uncustomary charges and then told me to pay the bill off. I was paying what I could with the little income I was getting and they still turned over to a collection agency. I didnt even know that it would affect my credit until the bank called me and informed me. What a joke. I thought credit was about applying for a loan and making payments on time, isnt that what credit is about. You have no way of knowing or planning for hosp bills. So WHY SHOULD THIS BE ON OUR CREDIT, WE DIDNT APPLY FOR THIS AMOUNT!!!! I had a good credit score, and now it is tanked. WELCOME TO THE AMERICAN DREAM (I MEAN JOKE)!!!!!!

    • Gerri Detweiler

      Brian – I wish we didn’t hear so many stories like yours! You may want to share your experience with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and let your legislators know how you feel about the Medical Debt Responsibility Act.

  • Janel

    I spent $800 per month 2 ONLY ins my son & my self w/Cobra Serve for 5 yrs.I couldn’t afford 2 add my hubby,& 2 other kids 2 my ins that wouldv’e been $2,ooo per month.(R entire income)My son & I both had medical issues.My son had surgery for a birth defect of his hand (he waswn’t able 2 use it 2 write with/dress himself)United Health Care said as did Ombus Cobra Serve said it would be covered;then both Cobra & United Health said it was cosmetic & refused 2 pay the bill (left me $18 grand in debt).I had a surgery breast reduction (the surgeon didn’t complete due 2 my heart & lungs stoping during the surgery).That bill was $22,000 & once again both ins refused 2 pay my bill saying it was cosmetic.6 yrs later I’m still trying 2 figure out what collection agenies 2 pay;my credits ruined!Also,the hospitals outsource all their many different doctors 2 P.O.Box address 2 mail payments 2 so U can get a sigature on arrival 2 prove I pd them.Plus tryn 2 keep tract of who got pd twice/not at all.The hospitals NEED 2 stop outsourcing & except the Payments OF ALL THEIR DOCTORS THAT WORK 4 THEM!I tried 2 pay my debts,& got my credit ruined,& flusher $75 grand down the toliet 4 USELESS MEDICAL (WASTEFUL)INsurance!I’d rather die than EVER buy medical ins again.At that time I had $40 grand in savings,but both Oakwood,& St Joephs Childrens hospitals refused cash,they said due 2 lawsuit liabilty risks,if u don’t have insurance,u & ur son don’t get ur surgery’s.My hubby was then servery injured from an unisured driver,then we had 2 live off the $40 grand for 3 yrs til he got on SSD.We were then left broke,& w/ wasted 5 yrs 0f $800 per month($75 grand we could have had in savings)And tapped out of r $40 grand we did have in the bank.Then,after living on r savings,being broke,we were left paying an additional $40 grand out in medical bills over 6 yrs now!Then my Dad passed away,& I had 2 pay his final expenses over the past 2 yrs,& SSD’s beeen tryn 2 cut my hubby,who’s got perment nerve,& orthopedic injures,& has learning disabilities in reading.We fought 2 get his benefits back,got em back,but then they canceled the medicare he was paying 4 every month.I wish the hospitals & Dr’s would sue the ins companies & NOT US!Medial INS is a Useless Waste of $!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • jeff julian

    we need a over haul on this and medical should not be part of your credit history…at all……….

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team