Home > Personal Finance > Paper or Plastic? Checks Aren’t Dead Yet, Merchants Say

Comments 2 Comments

The check, as you may have heard, has lost its lofty place as a preferred method of payment.

According to the Federal Reserve, checks constituted 30.5% of all noncash payments in 2006; just three years later, that figure had fallen all the way to 24.5%. And the numbers are far lower when it comes to actual point-of-sale purchases at retailers. In a 2009 survey of holiday shoppers by the National Retail Federation, for instance, just 4% of respondents said they would be paying for most of their gifts with personal checks. As debit cards provide the same service with increased convenience, it’s not hard to see why their usage has soared as checks have fallen.

And one has to imagine that retailers are relieved to see checks go the way of the Dodo. After all, nothing brings a line of shoppers to a halt quite like a person digging out a checkbook and a pen, and bottlenecked checkout lines can certainly result in fewer sales.

“Transaction processing is clearly one of the things driving conversion, or lack thereof, and when that gets long it can impact things,” says Mark Ryski of the Headcount Corporation, a retail analytics firm focused on turning shoppers into buyers. “And the notion of scribbling on a paper check and showing ID is archaic and profoundly slower.”

It’s also riskier for the merchant. Debit and credit cards are verified on the spot; if there are no funds, the transaction won’t go through. Sure, there’s always the chance that the card will turn out to be stolen and the merchant will wind up taking a hit when the issuer does a chargeback. But accepting a personal check is taking a leap of faith that the account in question has enough funds to cover the transaction. Short of pinning bad checks on a wall of shame behind the register, there’s not a whole lot a merchant can do when a check bounces.

“Instances of bad checks as a percentage of total checks is going up,” says Bob Meara, a senior analyst for research firm Celent who specializes in check processing and other payment topics. “Check volume is declining, but it’s leaving the same number of bad guys.” That shouldn’t really come as a surprise: When debit cards are so much more convenient (and still free to use, at least for now), it’s not unreasonable to suspect that anyone still pulling out a checkbook may be doing so because they don’t have funds to cover their purchase.

So checks slow things down at the cash register and expose the merchant to potential fraud. Since barely anyone uses them to pay anyway, why not just refuse to accept them?

Some merchants, particularly those with an emphasis on fast service, have done exactly that: Starbucks, for instance, banned personal and traveler’s checks a few years ago. And while hard statistics on check acceptance are hard to come by, Meara says that more merchants are indeed instituting policies against taking checks as a form of payment. Restaurants seem to be one category of merchant with little tolerance for personal checks; a spokesperson for the National Restaurant Association tells us that “it’s certainly not uncommon” for restaurants to refuse to take checks, mainly because of concern over bounced checks.

But such businesses are the exception rather than the rule. In one survey of small businesses conducted by Celent, 89% said they accepted personal checks, more than any other payment method. Many of those businesses, it should be said, are of the B2B variety, and were referring to how they like to be paid by vendors rather than customers. Still, it’s a good sign that checks haven’t become all that taboo.

“The vast majority of merchants still accept checks, and the primary reason they do is that checks don’t cost anything to use, as opposed to virtually any electronic method,” says Meara. While the Durbin Amendment capped swipe fees on debit cards, merchants are still taking a percentage hit on every transaction conducted with plastic, while they can keep 100% of the number on the check. Retailers are hardly going to turn away someone who wants to cut out the middleman by paying with a check.

“Many merchants still like checks, as they avoid the swipe fee that credit cards charge,” agrees Mickey Klein, a retail analyst at the Astor Group. He adds, though, that checks could become less attractive to retailers if that fee advantage dwindles. “I see a marked decrease in checks if credit card swiping fees come down and more merchants gear up for credit cards with tools such as Square.”

In the meantime, though, merchants will typically set their check policy based on factors like customer demographics and how much personal checks will gum up the works. Take grocery stores, for instance. Given how much emphasis there is in keeping things moving quickly in the checkout line – this is the retail sector that gave us self-checkout, after all – it’s not hard to imagine that grocers wouldn’t be crazy about taking personal checks. Yet Meara says that fear of losing the patronage of older customers has made most grocery stores reluctant to refuse checks, with the exception being chains like Whole Foods that tend to have younger, more affluent shoppers. Indeed, Whole Foods experimented with refusing checks in 2009, though a spokesperson tells us that the chain’s decentralized structure means that there isn’t an overarching check policy for its 300-plus stores.

So if you like paying with checks, you can still find plenty of places willing to take your money, even if your options have dwindled from a decade ago. But at the same time, it must be said that the advantages of checkbooks are similarly dwindling. Check float, that waiting period between when a check is written and when the money is actually withdrawn from your account, no longer exists, so you can’t write a check a few days before payday and expect the funds to be there by the time the bank processes it. And while some people like checkbooks as a way of keeping track of their spending, there are convenient online tools that provide the same functionality without searching for a pen.

Finally, keep in mind that checks aren’t exactly the most secure financial instrument to be toting around in your purse or pocket. Sure, most places will ask for a photo ID with a check, so a thief who gets a hold of your checkbook is unlikely to go on a check-writing spree. But those numbers on the bottom of the check can unlock a world of hurt for your checking account.

“With the routing and account number an imposter can go online and make purchases, pay bills, or create counterfeit checks,” explains Identity Theft 911 fraud investigator Vicki Volkert, who adds that there have been cases of cashiers and other employees using checks written by customers to commit fraud of this kind. And the consequences of such fraud are greater than those of simple card fraud. Not only will you likely have to cancel your account (as opposed to simply getting a new card), but you may not have the liability protection associated with credit and debit cards. In other words, you could be on the hook for whatever fraud happens on the account.

Image: CarbonNYC, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: 4 Bank Freebies That Still Exist | Credit.com News + Advice()

  • Mike

    “And the notion of scribbling on a paper check and showing ID is archaic and profoundly slower.”

    Really? I am a cashier at Target and am truly amazed that anyone complains about check writers.

    Cash payers often take longer rummaging through wallets/purses. So do debit card users who forget pin numbers. So do those cobbling multiple debit/credit cards together to find enough remaining debit/credit balance.

    As long as the check is ready and all except the amount is written in advance, it does not take much longer than a smooth debit transaction.

    “When debit cards are so much more convenient (and still free to use, at least for now), it’s not unreasonable to suspect that anyone still pulling out a checkbook may be doing so because they don’t have funds to cover their purchase.
    Credit.com (http://s.tt/1nYJV)”

    Yet another bizarre statement. Elderly check users often simply do not like technology. Some find that actually writing by hand the amount spent helps maintain awareness. Others simply lost their debit cards or have not fixed/activated them.

  • grace345

    Paying through paper checks is risky and take a lot of time in processing while paying online is a secure and fast.There are a number of online payment options are available nowadays(like ACH payments).Still people are using paper checks because”they used to write it”.

  • Pingback: 1 out of 5 people still carry a checkbook with them daily()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.



Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team