Home > Mortgages > New Rules Could Protect Homeowners from Foreclosure

Comments 0 Comments

A proposal from the government’s consumer lending watchdog would protect homeowners from unexpected fees, poor service and costly errors caused by companies that collect their monthly mortgage payments. The new rules, proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, also would require mortgage servicers to make homeowners’ monthly mortgage statements much easier to understand.

“These proposed rules would offer consumers basic protections and put the ‘service’ back into mortgage servicing,” Richard Cordray, director of the bureau, said in a press release. “The goal is to prevent mortgage servicers from giving their customers unwelcome surprises and runarounds.”

The first set of rules concerns disclosure. In addition to mortgage statements that clearly explain the loan’s principal, interest, fees, and the next due date, servicers would be required to warn homeowners sooner about interest rate increases on variable rate mortgages, and tell delinquent borrowers about their options before hitting them with foreclosure. Servicers have been criticized in recent years for charging excessive fees, and failing to have the documents required to prove they have the right to foreclose.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

Free Credit Check & MonitoringThat could become especially important in coming years, says Gerri Detweiler, Credit.com’s consumer credit expert, since mortgage interest rates are currently at record lows. Rates have nowhere to go but up, which could cause problems for homeowners whose interest rates are variable and tied to indices such as the Prime rate.

“There’s an awful lot of borrowers still sitting on adjustable rate loans,” Detweiler says, “and when rates start to go up again, they are going to be in trouble. If they aren’t prepared for that, it’s going to create a second wave of housing problems.”

The other set of rules proposed by the bureau would force servicers to improve their internal procedures. Servicers would be required to hire enough workers to answer homeowners’ questions, correct errors quickly, and offer homeowners options to avoid foreclosure.

[Related Article: My Mortgage: I’m Current Now, but Not for Long]

Servicers have been accused of making mistakes that incorrectly push homeowners into delinquency and foreclosure. Detweiler says she has firsthand experience with this. In her case, her servicer incorrectly labeled two monthly mortgage payments as late, which could have made the loan delinquent had Detweiler not caught the error in time. Under the proposed rules, servicers would be required to credit a homeowner’s account the same day a payment is received.

“That’s required right now for credit cards, and I don’t see any reason why it shouldn’t be required for mortgages, too,” says Detweiler.

First reactions to the proposed rules were almost universally positive. Some consumer groups like what they see of the proposal, even as they reserve final judgment to see what the final rules actually entail.

“It’s a really big deal,” says Ginna Green, a spokesperson for the Center for Responsible Lending. “Hopefully we’ll get good rules that will help prevent unnecessary foreclosures and keep more families in their homes.”

Even from groups that vociferously challenged the creation of the consumers bureau. The proposal is “an important step toward bringing certainty to our industry,” David H. Stevens, President and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association, said in a press release. “A number of servicers are already in the process of implementing most of these standards.”

Others consider the rules long overdue.

“I am glad that the CFPB has prioritized mortgage servicing because it was an extremely under-regulated industry before the CFPB,” says Robert Lawless, a professor at the University of Illinois College of Law and an expert on consumer credit. Before the bureau was created, Lawless says, the banking industry and some federal regulators, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, “were fighting state efforts to supervise mortgage servicers.”

The proposal is based in the bureau’s mandate by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to address problems in the mortgage servicing industry. The bureau is accepting public comments on the proposal, and the final rules will be issued in January 2013.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]

Image: roarofthefour, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team