Home > Mortgages > Homebuyers: Interest Rates Could Get Even Lower

Comments 1 Comment

Since the beginning of the year, mortgage rates have routinely set new record lows, but some experts now believe that the current levels could be even lower.

Interest rates on home loans have been below 4 percent for all but one week this year and only recently rose from the all-time record, but some experts now believe that if banks were willing to reduce their profits, they could hit alarmingly low levels, according to a report from the New York Times. Rates in some parts of the country are currently as low as 3.55 percent, but banks’ new profit margin requirements may have inflated that.

“The banks may say, ‘We are offering you record low interest rates, so you should be as happy as a clam,'” Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance, a home loan publication, told the newspaper. “But borrowers could be getting them cheaper.”

In reality, consumers could be paying as little as 3.05 percent on their mortgage, the report said. Banks say that the higher costs — and commensurate profits that come with them — are being applied to home loans these days because they are pricier to originate due to federal regulation.

However, much of the profit comes from a combination of packaging mortgages with higher interest rates into bonds, which are then sold to investors, and also because there is now less competition within the home loan industry itself than there was prior to the recession, the report said. Many financial institutions have gone out of business or merged in the last several years, meaning that only a handful of large banks remain to issue mortgages on a broad scale.

The problem is that in many instances, there is little federal regulators can do to make banks charge the lower interest rates they could be giving consumers, the report said. For instance, if the Federal Reserve were to continue buying up mortgage bonds, that would actually increase banks’ profits because it would drive prices for those packages down and increase the margin between those and home loan rates.

However, despite the fact that many consumers could theoretically be getting better deals on their home loans, home affordability has never been better thanks to low rates combined with still-depressed property values.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • sanama51

    Don’t tell me that! I just locked in a rate for a second home. Just kidding. At some point you have to decide the time is right to lock in and hope you make the right decision with the information you have available at the time.

    And once you’ve made your decision don’t check rates ever again in case they keep going down!!!

  • Pingback: Homebuyers: Interest Rates Could Get Even Lower | Credit.com … | Home Loans Tips()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team