Home > 2012 > Credit Cards

4 Ways Your Credit Card Is Changing

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

The way we pay with plastic has changed a lot over the years, from the explosion in debit card usage over the last couple decades to the proliferation of rewards cards from retail stores, airlines and hotel chains. But the physical features of cards have evolved. Here are some of the ways that the look and feel of your card has changed over the last several years, and how it will continue to change in the near future.

No More Raised Numbers?

Seeing credit cards with embossed characters — that is, those raised numbers and letters on the front of the card — bring to mind the old days, when credit card transactions were carried out with “knuckle buster” devices that took a physical imprint of the card. They also served a security function by making it harder for the card to duplicate.

“At the time, an embossing machine was pretty expensive for crooks to get their hands on,” says Raul Vargas of Identity Theft 911.

Now both functions seems somewhat archaic — it’s easier for identity thieves to replicate the embossing, and most transactions are carried out by swiping the magnetic strip. As such, both Visa and MasterCard now offer customers flat cards without the 3-D lettering.

One advantage to unembossed cards is that your local bank can make you one on the spot, allowing you to walk into a bank and then walk out with a new credit card.

“There has been a move to put instant issuance of the card into the branch,” explains David Robertson, publisher of consumer payment journal the Nilson Report. “It’s there that you’re seeing cards issued with less levels of personalization than are available to the bureau mailing the card.”

Unembossed cards are far from becoming the standard, in part because many merchants still rely on old-fashioned carbon-copy devices as a backup; Robertson says that hundreds of thousands of the devices are still sold every year. But don’t be surprised if the next card you get is smooth to the touch.

Smart Cards

Magnetic strips replaced carbon-copying a long time ago, but even they aren’t the most up-to-date way of paying with a credit card. So-called smart cards use embedded chips instead of magnetic strips to make payments; depending on the technology, the chip may require you to insert the card into a slot or simply wave it at a special terminal. The terminals can be found everywhere from gas stations to New York City cabs, and issuers offer a variety of contactless cards (like MasterCard’s PayPass line). Still, chipped cards are by no means common in the U.S., as adaptation of the chipped cards (and the terminals that accept them) has been relatively slow here when compared with Europe, where smart cards are the standard.

But that’s going to change in the next decade.

“[The issuers] have all committed to chipped cards,” says Robertson. “It’s a multi-step process, and the first step will involve the merchants’ side, with banks sending out directives to the merchant community.”

The first deadline is just a year away, he says, and he estimates that there will be widespread use by 2015.

Even then, don’t expect to see the magnetic stripes disappear. Even those ahead-of-the-curve Americans who currently use smart cards generally have “hybrid” cards with both chips and magnetic stripes, so that they can be used at either kind of terminal. That’s likely to continue for the foreseeable future as retailers are slow to adapt.

“There will be some merchants who deploy terminals by the deadline, but it’s overwhelmingly likely that most will not meet the deadline,” says Robertson. “This is not a situation where someone snaps their finger and it all gets done.”

Evolving (and Disappearing) Security Features

Embossed numbers are among a few physical security features implemented by card makers over the years, all with the goal of making the cards difficult to replicate.

“They updated the signature panel so it’s not just a blank sticker,” recalls Vargas, explaining that the background of the panel would be layered with a background pattern of the words “Visa” or “MasterCard,” for instance. A similar approach was taken with the logo itself, which on closer inspection was revealed to be made up of tiny letter Vs (in the case of Visa cards). And then there were the holograms embedded in the front of the card, which were likewise difficult to copy for thieves. But all three have seemingly fallen out of favor.

“They used holograms because they’re hard to replicate, but I don’t think many issuers use holograms anymore,” says Vargas, who says the same holds true for the special logos designed from tiny letters. Meanwhile, the patterned background of the signature panel only appears on some cards these days. It seems that as crooks became more sophisticated, it stopped being worth the trouble for banks to load their cards up with fraud-proof design features.

“U.S. banks care about cost versus rewards,” says Vargas. “Twenty years ago the hologram stopped fraud, but now that the crooks have the technology to reproduce that, it’s no longer worth it.”

So what security features remain? There is the CVV code, the three-digit numerical string on the back of the card intended for card-not-present transactions. And if you’ve got a smart card — especially one without a magnetic strip — it will be difficult for a thief to steal the payment data off it (whether or not you wrap it in tinfoil). And the hologram is evolving, too — in 2005, for instance, MasterCard introduced cards that embed holograms directly into the magnetic strip.

Offbeat Designs

If doing away with embossed lettering doesn’t make your card sleek and stylish, why not take the next step and just do away with numbers and lettering altogether? That’s what Discover did with its Discover it card, which removes the name and number from the front of the card, leaving only the logo. The relevant information is instead transferred to the back of the card. And lest you think that a card with no readily visible name on the front of the card is less secure, note that it comes with a patterned signature field, a hologram-embedded magnetic strip and $0 liability on fraudulent purchases. And the rewards aren’t bad, either.

Other issuers have gone in the opposite direction, adorning the card with bells and whistles in an attempt to separate themselves from the pack. Take the Citi G2, a rewards card that Citibank began testing back in 2010. The card is adorned with two tiny buttons: one for regular credit card transactions, and another which allows you to pay for your purchase with whatever rewards you’ve managed to accumulate. A tiny light will even indicate which mode you’re in.

Finally, some credit card issuers have experimented with different materials for their cards. The American Express Centurion card, for instance, is made of anodized titanium, while the J.P. Morgan Palladium card is made of palladium and gold. These and other non-plastic credit cards are generally geared toward an exclusive, high-income crowd, so chances are you won’t get to pull one out of your pocket. Still, it’s a good example of how issuers are using unique design choices to differentiate their cards from the competition.

Image: Andres Rueda, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team