Home > Managing Debt > To Pay or Not to Pay? The Question of Old Debts

Comments 1 Comment

It’s the perfect Catch-22. Because of the lingering foreclosure crisis and the nation’s stagnant economic recovery, the Federal Reserve is holding interest rates at near-record lows, making right now the perfect time to get a mortgage.

But also because of continued problems in the mortgage industry and the economy as a whole, banks are more risk-averse than they’ve been in decades. Which makes it difficult for nearly everyone but those with sterling credit to actually succeed in getting a mortgage.

A Credit.com reader using the screen name “Von” finds herself caught in exactly this bind. To take advantage of lower interest rates, she and her husband recently applied to refinance their mortgage. But in the process, they discovered an unpaid medical bill that, unbeknownst to them, has been weighing down their credit score.

Now Von faces a conundrum. Her lender says that the couple needs to repay the medical bill, which is in collections, before it will approve her for a new mortgage. But the bill is 42 months old. And in Texas, where Von and her husband live, the statute of limitations on old debts is 48 months.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

“We want to resolve” the collections issue, “however do not have the entire amount” needed to pay off the old bill, Von writes in response to a Credit.com story.

Free Tool: Credit Report CardWhat to do? Begin a payment plan, which will use up money that Von and her husband need for monthly expenses? Or ignore it entirely, knowing that in another six months the bill can no longer be collected anyway?

On the one hand, there is an argument to be made that Von and her husband should ignore the debt. After all, paying the debt off now won’t have any immediate impact on improving their credit score. Rather, it will linger there for seven and a half years after it first went to collections, hurting their score all the while. And making payments on the debt now might hurt the couple’s ability to meet daily expenses or save up for the next big purchase they make, whether it be a new house or another car.

But Von and her husband have lots more to think about than just running out the statute of limitations, says Barry Paperno, Credit.com’s credit scoring expert. One problem is something that the couple has already run up against: their lender is “encouraging” them to clear up this unpaid medical bill before it will approve them for a refinanced mortgage, Von says.

That situation may not change, says Paperno. That’s because the relevant frame of reference here may not be the four years it takes for an unpaid bill to become uncollectible. Rather, it’s the seven and a half years that unpaid bill lingers on a credit report. As long as that unpaid bill remains on the couple’s credit history, lenders may refuse to extend additional credit.

“It has nothing to do with the score,” Paperno says. “Let’s say they take their chances and don’t pay it. The lender or credit card company may still decline them. As long as it’s on there and it’s unpaid, don’t go applying for credit anytime soon.

[Related Article: 8 Things Debt Collectors Won’t Tell You]

That’s assuming the couple makes it through their six-month window unscathed. The collections agency could still sue Von and her husband in court. It could also sell the debt to another, more aggressive collections company, which would have time to sue before the statute of limitations is up.

“They could just come after you tomorrow,” Paperno says.

The judge in the case might side with Von and her husband, or maybe with the collections company. If the company wins, the couple will be forced to pay the debt. But even if the couple wins, Paperno explains, that judgment becomes another negative stain on their credit report, another mark documenting an unpaid bill. And that judgment will linger there for another seven-and-a-half years.

“Even if you pay the next day, right after you receive the judgment, it doesn’t help your score,” Paperno says. “So there is a risk there.”

Von and her husband are right to pause now and weigh their options before moving forward to pay an old debt, especially one she says they did not know existed for more than three years. But adding up all the risks for long-term harm, Paperno says, it’s probably best to tackle the issue head-on and pay the debt if they can.

“Flat out, I don’t like to recommend that someone not pay a debt that they owe,” says Paperno.

[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free with Credit.com]

Image: Karen Eliot, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.bills.com Daniel @ Bills.com

    I recommend that Von and her husband negotiate a reduced balance settlement with the creditor. They have strong leverage because of the fact that Texas doesn’t allow a wage garnishment for this kind of debt. That makes the creditor less likely to sue, even though it could try to get a bank levy were it to obtain a judgment. Proof that the debt is resolved and at $0 will satisfy the mortgage lender, so Von and her husband wife can get their loan to go through.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team