Home > Identity Theft > Hilton Customers at Risk of ID Theft, Blogger Alleges

Comments 0 Comments

As a security consultant who travels up to 40 weeks a year, T. Robert Wyatt has spent his share of nights in Hilton hotels. In recent years, he has noticed problems with Hilton that extend far beyond unclean rooms or clogged shower drains.

According to a lengthy recent blog post, Wyatt says that he has found a series of significant security problems on various Hilton websites. The problems may expose regular Hilton guests to the risks of data breaches and identity theft, similar to those that hit LinkedIn, LastFM, Sony and other prominent companies over the last year.

Wyatt also alleges that the company knows about the security problems, but has repeatedly ignored warnings about them.

“Despite my best efforts Hilton has declined to take any action and has continued for several years to knowingly expose their customers’ information,” Wyatt writes in his post.

If true, the security lapses could pose a serious risk to the identities of people who stay at Hilton hotels and use the company’s website, says Ondrej Krehel, information security officer at Identity Theft 911, Credit.com’s sister company.

“It still needs to be verified,” Krehel says. “But if this is accurate, I would consider this to be pretty serious.”

The heart of the problem, says Wyatt, is that when guests sign into Hilton’s HHonors loyalty program on the company’s homepage, their usernames and passwords are sent without encryption. This is contrary to the site’s assurance to guests that “Your login is always executed through a secure connection.”

If true, this lax security exposes Hilton guests to numerous threats, Wyatt says. Since many Web users still reuse passwords across multiple sites, hackers could use data gathered from Hilton’s website to break into accounts across the web.

“Generally consumers have one password for everything,” Krehel says. “So if you can get the password, you can sign into that person’s email or financial accounts.”

Hackers could book rooms in the name of their identity theft victims, Wyatt says. They could also use guests’ registration information to know when victims will not be at home, possibly making it easier to rob them, Wyatt says. Or the hackers could use the data to snoop guests’ online activity when logged into a Hilton hotel’s Wi-Fi network.

“Having provided all sorts of motive for hackers,” Wyatt writes, “Hilton kindly provides the means as well.”

Wyatt found additional problems with Hilton’s “Double Miles” promotion, which he says stored users’ login information either with simple encryption or no encryption at all. It was exactly this kind of vulnerability, Krehel says, that hackers exploited to steal millions of user logins from Sony, LinkedIn, eHarmony and LastFM. We reported on these breaches here.

“All [these sites] either stored passwords in the clear or with reversible encryption, all were breached and all of these breaches exposed the passwords,” Wyatt writes.

For regular Hilton guests, Wyatt gives advice for how you can log into the website without possibly exposing yourself to hackers. Don’t log into the Hilton HHonors program from the company’s homepage. Rather, enter a fake user ID and password, and hit Enter, Wyatt says. That will give you an error page and a form to re-type your login. This form is sent via SSL, which means the data is encrypted.

After that, Wyatt urges Hilton guests to do a little advocacy on their own.

“Then call their customer service and complain that they have been knowingly exposing your login credentials and personal information for years and demand that they fix it,” he says.

Calls to Hilton and Wyatt were not immediately returned.

Image: Kate Williams, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team