Home > 2012 > Identity Theft

A Secure Credit System is Key to Economic Prosperity

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

The national economy continues to be stalled in a pattern of slow growth, as many Americans unfortunately know from personal experience. This is evident in a stubborn unemployment rate, discouraged workers, business challenges, and state and local government revenue shortfalls. Leading economists agree that the housing sector — one of the nation’s principle economic engines — has contributed to the stall. After every national recession in the post-war era, economic recoveries have been led by a housing rebound. After this Great Recession, every important housing indicator has lagged. New housing production, existing home sales, home prices, housing materials manufacturing, and housing-related employment all fell to record lows and have made meager progress since 2008. Considering that housing construction, residential finance, building materials, and household furnishings taken together comprise as much as 15% of GDP in a normal economy, the continuing depression in housing is a major national problem.

The overhang of foreclosed properties, the specter of pending foreclosures, the surplus inventory of distressed properties, lack of buyer confidence because of employment conditions — all of these are key factors in the ongoing housing stall. However, it’s the unreasonably stringent underwriting standards for mortgages that are currently preventing many creditworthy potential homebuyers from buying homes. This reduces number of families who can purchase from the supply of existing homes, who can spur production of new homes, and who can energize both the housing markets and national GDP growth.

It is clear that undisciplined lending practices were major contributors to the housing crisis, which precipitated the serious recession. However, a range of forces have resulted in an over-correction so severe that lenders are imposing high down payment levels, overly rigid debt-to-income ratios, and increasingly high credit score requirements. The Federal Reserve System noted on this in a recent report: “Continued efforts are needed to find an appropriate balance between prudent lending and appropriate consumer protection, on the one hand, and not unduly restricting mortgage credit, on the other hand.” The availability of responsible home mortgage credit is a pre-condition for reinvigoration of the housing sector and indeed acceleration of the national economy.

This is why it’s so important to have organizations that work to sustain and enhance the functioning of a strong, credible and trustworthy credit system is of great importance. Expertise is needed to assure the accuracy and transparency of credit assessments and particularly of credit scores. It is essential that we maintain a system of review and interaction that allows consumers to easily access and know their credit status, contest inaccuracies, and secure corrections expeditiously when the facts warrant them. In this era of illicit incursions into private data and identity theft, it is also critical to have systems that prevent unfair damage to consumers life-long credit histories because they have been subjected to illegal acts. In a world where financial record-keeping and personal well-being are electronically, instantaneously, and intensely intertwined, a secure credit system is neither a luxury nor an expendable option; rather it is at the heart of the functioning of our economy.

This reality is abundantly clear in the current sideways drift of our nation’s housing sector. Housing economists estimate that correction of today’s overly stringent lending standards and a return to workable practices pre-2000, before the housing boom, would result in increases in home sales of from 15 to 20 percent. Such credit corrections would spur major improvements in the performance of the housing sector and contribute immensely to the economic growth which our nation needs to create jobs, raise incomes, and reduce both personal and national debt. A secure and responsible credit system–a network of reliable transactions, of secure records, of fair assessments, and of balanced rights and responsibilities–is a vital component of the modern wiring of a prosperous and just society.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: m thierry, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team