Home > 2012 > Credit Score

How to Fix a Credit Report Mistake Fast

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 3 Comments

Increased scrutiny of loan applications means that getting a mortgage loan today can be a nail-biting experience. For some, there is that heart-stopping moment when the loan officer says, “There is a problem with your credit.” What if that “problem” is a mistake and you don’t have a lot of time to fix it? Reader Kathy writes:

We are trying to refi our home for a lower interest rate and are being penalized about a 1/2 percent because of my credit score. My credit is…almost flawless. Other than real estate, have used less than 10% of available credit and all credit cards are paid monthly.

I had an auto payment with (a bank) for years and it was paid in full last year. In May of ’06 there was some sort of snafu by the bank and on my report it was noted as a 30 day late. It was an error. I have the original letter from the Vice President who is no longer there that it was an error and would be removed. His executive secretary is still there and is trying to help as she remembers the situation and also has the letter on file. Problem is they are using a different credit reporting agency, she says. She is a great gal but sounds lost as to how to fix this. Any suggestions other than contacting all three credit agencies directly? And is phone or the computer or mail best for the fastest results?

When an important loan like a mortgage is on the line, how do you fix a credit report quickly? I turned to four industry pros to help Kathy navigate this process.

Go To The Source

Norm Magnuson, vice president of public affairs for the Consumer Data Industry Association, was the first to weigh in. He said:

The most timely method (for) having data corrected in the credit report is going directly to the lender that reported it. They simply need to notify the consumer reporting agency (CRA) that the account information needs to be changed. If the consumer goes through the CRA, the data in question must be verified within 30 days. On average, 80 percent of the time the CRA receives a response back from the lender within 10 days.

Susan Henson, senior director, public relations for Experian suggested the following:

If a consumer has a legitimate proof document from a creditor they can submit that document to us when they initiate a dispute. Also the creditor can submit proof documents to us through a system called the profile maintenance system. Either way, we review these documents to verify the account details and if, indeed, the information is not accurate it will be removed.

She recommends consumers use their online dispute process which she says “is very fast. Although by FCRA mandate we have 30 days to resolve disputes, the vast majority are resolved in 14 days or less.”

Will I Lose My Chance to Refi?

Are there any shortcuts for correcting a credit report quickly when a mortgage loan is on the line? Joe Kelly, president of Arcloan.com shared this advice:

First of all, a single 30-day late payment from six years ago should not be causing her any issues on applying for a mortgage now. I have no idea why a lender would be telling her that is an issue. I suspect there is more to the story or she is misunderstanding the lender she is working with. Conventional mortgages require no late payments in the past 24 months. FHA and VA require none in the past year. Six years ago is ancient history. Perhaps the issue is really other items.

Secondly, she has a letter from the creditor stating it was a mistake. If it is showing on her credit report it is because that bank is reporting it that way. If they are still in business she should get the bank to correct their record and report it as not late. If they are not in business, or not responsive, she should be able to provide that letter to whatever credit agency is pulling her report for her mortgage (i.e. Kroll). They should be able to use that to remove it from the report being used by the mortgage company she is applying with. This will not permanently remove it from her record, however. It would still show up if someone else pulled her credit but it would solve the issue with her current (mortgage loan) application.

Third, she can send a copy of the letter to the three credit bureaus and request it be removed from her reports. That’s obviously not a “quick” fix.

Fix It or You’ll Hear From a Lawyer

I asked attorney Robert Brennan whose firm handles credit damage and identity theft cases whether a consumer in this type of situation may have legal action against the bank for failing to correct the mistake. He replied that he would “need to see some of the internal paperwork between the bank and the credit bureaus to answer this question.” But he went on to describe the dispute procedure in more detail, along with advice for others who may be experiencing similar frustration:

When a furnisher, such as the bank, originates modifying or deleting credit information, it transmits [a notice] electronically to the bureaus.

The bank also has to block or suppress the derogatory in its electronic batch transmission that it sends to the bureaus, likely once each month. If the bank sends out [a notice] but does not also suppress the derogatory in its batch transmission, it risks that the derogatory will be suppressed or blocked for a single month, and then reappear the following month.

There could be responsibility on the credit bureau end as well. When a credit bureau receives [a notice] directing that it block or suppress a derogatory, it is supposed to make that a permanent change in the consumer’s credit file. In theory, the credit bureau is supposed to block or suppress the derogatory permanently such that it would not change if a new batch transmission came in with the old derogatory information, but this does not always happen.

I would also need to see the exchange between the bureaus and the bank in response to the consumer’s dispute to the bureaus. The dispute to the bureaus will result in the creation of an “Automated Consumer Dispute Verification” sent from bureaus to bank…. The bank is supposed to reinvestigate and correct, modify or delete any false, inaccurate or unverifiable information once it receives an ACDV form from a credit bureau, all within 30 days. It’s likely a shared-responsibility situation.

If I were representing the consumer, I would have him/her write a letter to all bureaus and to the bank, directing that they IMMEDIATELY correct the false credit reporting or face legal consequences. I’d send the letter certified but I’d also fax it. (In a list of tips for disputing credit report mistakes on his website, Brennan discourages consumers from disputing items online or by phone.) If the consumer is in a position to drop off a copy at the bank personally, I would do that as well, with a witness. Attach a copy of the earlier letter from the bank directing that the derogatory be suppressed.

The bank and the bureaus have the ability to act very quickly when they want to, but they generally will not act quickly unless faced with legal action.

Next Time, Buy Time

Of course, I wouldn’t be doing my job if I didn’t encourage Kathy and other readers to check their credit reports and scores at least 60 days before trying to obtain an important loan like a mortgage or auto loan so there will be ample time to deal with mistakes. You can get a single copy of your credit report for free each year and you can monitor your credit scores for free using Credit.com’s Free Credit Report Card.

Image: Lenore Edman, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Kathy Worley

    Hi, I am Kathy Worley, and I was the person in the article that Gerri referred to. Interesting as the comments were, it truly demonstrates that no one has all of the answers about how credit works. One mortgage broker commented that a 30 day late should not have a bearing on my score and that there could be other issues. Wrong. Not only was it years old, it was paid off! Older items in my case appeared to be just as troublesome despite the mortgage brokers opinion. There was in fact one other item on my report that was also incorrect and that was actually older and and is due to be removed in less than a year, on an otherwise flawless credit report. Because the second issue was actually from a dispute from my business, it was more tedious to remove. My credit reflects a person who never made a late payment and who has most of her credit available to her. And yet, my scores varied from a score in the 600’s to the high 700’s. I was informed by B of A and Wells Fargo that my scores would negatively effect my interest rate on our home refi. I asked them directly, after they commented on how my score would effect the rate,- do you actually read the reports? I am of the opinion that they use a credit report as a tool to justify a higher rate. As old as these 2 items were, it is evident that credit is evaluated by some sort of system, not by humans. And the system (FICO) is seriously flawed. When I called the bank who misreported a 30 day late from years prior, they recommended I file an online complaint for the fastest results. After speaking with Gerri and learning that the bank likely had the ability to speed up the results, I called the bank again and firmly insisted that they also contact the credit agency. They finally acquiesced and I recieved notification within 2 weeks that the error was corrected, although it will be additional time for all to be updated. Credit reports are obviously necessary, but clearly come with many failings.

    • Gerri Detweiler

      Thanks again Kathy for sharing your experience and I am glad you were able to clear it up finally. What a pain in the meantime!

  • Pingback: ireadmogulmag.com – 8 Signs Your Identity Has Been Compromised by Credit.com (By Jeanine Skowronski)()

  • Pingback: 3 Ways to Boost Your Credit Score by Labor Day | Credit.com News + Advice()

  • Pingback: Year End Credit Check-Up: Have You Done Yours? | Credit.com News + Advice()

  • Pingback: The Pocket Guide to Your Credit Rights | Credit.com News + Advice()

  • Pingback: The Pocket Guide to Your Credit Rights | ComparePlastic()

  • Pingback: The Pocket Guide to Your Credit Rights ← WORLD NEWS()

  • Pingback: The Danger of Not Checking Your Credit Report | ComparePlastic()

  • http://www.credit.com/ Credit.com Credit Experts

    Wendy — if the collection isn’t accurate, you should dispute it. The fact that it’s showing up in your credit reports will have an impact. For detailed instructions on how to file a dispute and writing an effective dispute letter, this should help:

    A Step-by-Step Guide to Disputing Credit Report Errors
    8 Rules of an Effective Credit Report Dispute Letter

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team