Home > Personal Finance > The Case for “Alternative Credit”

Comments 0 Comments

Unless they are in trouble, most people don’t wake up in the morning thinking about credit. Not even me, and I’ve spent much of my career immersed in it. But for most people, credit is an afterthought, and that’s unfortunate given the impact it has on our lives. Credit is now at a crossroads. It’s evolving right in front of us and that could mean real changes in the way we interact with it. Alternative credit is something we’ll all need to think about, though perhaps not first thing in the morning.

Before I joined eCredable, I spent the prior 7 years at the credit reporting agency Equifax. I got up close and personal with the credit ecosystem, both from the perspective of the creditor as well as the consumer. In my capacity as President of Equifax Personal Information Solutions, I worked with a team of people to create a variety of products targeted at helping consumers understand and navigate the complexities of the credit system. It’s a topic that requires the development of thoughtful and deliberate products that meet the needs of the infrequent credit shopper.

When you read the extraordinary amount of information that is written daily on the topic of credit, from the perspective of the creditor and the consumer, there’s a never-ending discussion on the relevance of credit to our everyday lives. Is alternative credit relevant to the way we conduct our daily financial lives? Now, more than ever, the answer is a resounding “Yes,” and here’s why.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

Free Credit Check & MonitoringTraditional credit originates with the national credit bureaus (Experian, Equifax and Transunion) and consists of the payment information you make for repaying debt, like credit card balances, car loans, and mortgages. It also includes negative information like collections, liens, and bankruptcies. It has been around for quite some time. Like any new source of information, it took awhile for credit reporting and credit scoring to gain acceptance across the entire financial landscape. Understanding that the pace of change is highly correlated to the pace of technological advancements, it’s no surprise that automating the decisions associated with credit has been one step behind on this journey. Even though businesses have been able to use credit information in every facet of their decision making processes about consumers (their customers), they never seem to have enough information to further refine their ability to make financial risk based decisions. As the Great Recession exposed the risky lending practices of many lenders, part of the backlash includes a new focus on finding new sources of information to make more informed decisions.

Credit bureaus refer to information that is not contained in a consumer credit file as “alternative data.” In the context of consumer credit, it just makes sense to refer to this same information as “alternative credit” when you consider that this alternative data will be used for credit-related decisions. But why is this data “alternative” in the first place? Why can’t the credit bureaus get all this information housed in the same databases as the information used for “traditional credit?” It comes down to two simple but important business reasons: information availability and compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

[Related Article: Free Consumer Reports: Nationwide Specialty Agencies]

By information availability, I mean the ability and desire for businesses that have payment information about consumers to report this information to the national credit bureaus. If there’s nothing in it for them, why go through the time and expense to share this information? It takes people and technical resources to report information to the credit bureaus. The information has to meet a significant number of minimum requirements for the credit bureaus to accept the information (the keys are quantity and quality). In short, you can’t just throw numbers out there and hope they stick.

By FCRA compliance, I mean the legal obligations that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (as well as FACTA, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003) places upon data furnishers. (Data furnisher is the name credit bureaus give to companies that provide data to them.) If a business reports information to the credit bureaus, the business needs to be prepared to respond to consumer disputes. In other words, when a consumer applies for credit and he or she is turned down due to an incorrect piece of information that was provided by the data furnisher, the business needs to be prepared to manage a consumer dispute and the potential for a subsequent legal action against the business.

All this adds up to people, time, and money. If businesses can’t significantly offset the expense of providing data with insights that will help them run their business better and be more profitable, then there’s no reason to report data to the credit bureaus. But this doesn’t lessen the need for companies to understand alternative credit. Most businesses want more customers, but they only want more “profitable” customers. They don’t want to extend credit to someone they don’t think can pay them back as agreed. It’s just common sense.

Approximately 75 percent of the adult population in the U.S. has traditional credit. The remaining 25 percent of the population has to get by with alternative credit. Alternative credit is defined as “credit reports and credit scores developed from data sources not typically contained in the national credit bureaus such as rent, utilities, insurance, and other forms of payment.”

If you’re a business, your first question is “how reliable is this information in making risk decisions?” FICO answered this question in 2007 when it released the FICO Expansion Score™, which uses alternative data to produce a credit score. The company was able to demonstrate that the FICO Expansion Score is comparable in its predictive values as traditional credit scores when evaluating credit. The predictability of the score was extremely similar to the FICO Score all the way through the score range of 300-850, until the score reached 780 (in the higher end of the scale, and not very relevant to assessing people without traditional FICO scores). This is important information, since FICO sets the standard for credit scoring.

If you’re a consumer without a traditional credit history (often called “thin file” or “no file” in our world), you’re probably wondering how you can use alternative credit to your advantage. The easy answer is that alternative credit allows you to build a credit history based on things you buy, not things you charge, like utility bills, rent payments, cell phone bills and auto insurance premiums.

[Related Article: Specialty Consumer Reporting Agencies: Tenant History Reports]

The law’s on your side: the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) already provides you with the ability to provide this kind of information any time you apply for credit, and the credit grantor must consider this kind of information when using credit related information to make a decision.

Most consumers don’t know about this law, and most creditors don’t want to enlighten them. Why? Creditors have no easy way of accepting and using this information in making risk related business decisions. Creditors are completely hooked on using automated credit reports and scores to make these decisions without human intervention. If a consumer shows up at their place of business with a shoebox full of cancelled rent checks, utility bills marked paid, and various other pieces of paper that proves they paid their bills on time, the creditor would have a lot of work to do to understand the value and validity of this information. (It’s a little like how creditors made risk decisions 50 years ago.)

So what’s a consumer to do? The goal of alternative credit bureaus (like eCredable and others) is to help consumers overcome this challenge. If a consumer wants to avoid going into debt to prove their creditworthiness, but still wants to demonstrate their creditworthiness, having the bills they pay routinely that are not reported to the national credit bureaus can be extremely helpful. For years, creditors have used Alternative Credit in mortgage underwriting. This same approach is being extended to auto loans and credit cards as well.

eCredable is one of the companies helping to address the market need, albeit from the consumer perspective. Experian has expanded its credit file to include rental payment information from some of the larger property management systems that are willing to share data. Equifax has long been in the employment and income verification business, and is looking to complement this information with alternative data. Every year, more companies recognize the need to verify credit worthiness with alternative data, and I believe their requirements for alternative data for risk mitigation purposes will grow exponentially over the next two decades.

Is it time for “Alternative Credit” to join the mainstream credit conversation? It’s long overdue.

[Free Resource: Check your credit score and report card for free with Credit.com]

Image: CarbonNYC, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team