Home > Mortgages > New Rules Let Troubled Borrowers Get a Mortgage Sooner

Comments 0 Comments

Are you one of the millions of consumers who opted to do a short sale on your home during the mortgage crisis?  There may be some good news for you as earlier this month, Fannie Mae announced new mortgage guidelines targeted at troubled mortgage borrowers that potentially reduces the amount of time it takes to obtain a new mortgage from four years to two years.

The overwhelming majority of mortgage lenders follow mortgage underwriting rules published by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  So if you lost your home to a short sale or turned it over to the bank and are now thinking of financing a new home, it’s a good idea to familiarize yourself with their guidelines. The new rules are scheduled to go into effect on July 1, 2012.

Check Your Credit For FreeAs they say, the devil is in the details and not all qualification information is available (or easily found).  In summary, you will be required to come up with a 20% down payment to obtain a mortgage in the reduced two-year time period unless you can prove your problems were the result of extenuating circumstances, for example — a divorce, medical expenses or unemployment.  In these cases, you may be able to secure a mortgage in the shorter two year time period with a lower 10% down payment.

It is my understanding that there are also requirements that interested consumers also meet certain credit and ability to pay standards and pass Fannie Mae’s credit criteria screens — which review your credit report and credit scores.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

This could be a substantial challenge for many of the consumers for whom this revised rule is targeted to benefit.

The presence of a short sale information or flag on a credit bureau report is considered negative by most all credit scores, as it predicts future credit risk. The flag can stay on the report for up to seven years.  Generally speaking, the impact on score will be severe.  The exact impact on a given consumer’s credit score resulting from the reporting of a short sale will depend on several factors:

  • The information associated with the short sale reported, and
  • The current credit profile of the consumer (the other activity being reported on the consumer).

The negative impact on score is more noticeable if this item is posted on a credit file that has no or little history of missed payments and/or derogatory information and has low balances on active credit.  In these scenarios, the points lost can be 100 or greater.  The impact may be less noticeable if there are indications of high risk behavior (missed payments, etc.) on the credit bureau report as the credit score is already lower — reflecting that higher risk behavior.

There are not really any “tricks” to quickly increase the score quickly when this information is posted on the file.  The points lost due to the short sale flag will have (gradually) less impact over time as the date it was originally posted becomes older (and assuming that you have no other delinquency information on your file).

It appears that this rule change will be most helpful to those impacted consumers who have already re-built their credit since they first enacted the short sale, have steady and sufficient income and are deemed capable of successfully handling the new mortgage they are seeking.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]

Image: macrofarm, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team