Home > 2012 > Mortgages

Obama’s Mortgage Task Force: Working Hard or Hardly Working?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

National Mortgage SettlementMaybe you’re reading about it less and less. It doesn’t seem to be the lead story on many national news broadcasts anymore. But it’s still there, festering away like an untreated wound.

The foreclosure crisis and the morass of other problems surrounding persistently problematic real estate prices, unwise loans made to now-bereft homeowners, and predatory mortgage products and practices isn’t going away. But this week, at last, there was some news. Unfortunately, the news by and large is that there is little news.

[Credit Check Tool: Try Credit.com’s Free Credit Report Card]

The New York Daily News just published an Op-Ed noting that 85 days after President Obama announced its formation in an impassioned speech, the new Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group (RM-BSWG) had done virtually nothing. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who the Co-chairs the group with Colorado U.S. attorney John Walsh, admitted earlier this month that the RM-BSWG had no office space and no staff. So… No one works there yet. (The piece was written by Arnie Graf, co-director of the Industrial Areas Foundation, and Mike Gecan, an IAF trustee. IAF was founded by Saul Alinsky and works as a coalition of nonprofits, in a model similar to Nader’s PIRG network.)

Calls made to the Justice Department a few days ago, where the Working Group is legally housed, were fruitless as departmental operators had no clue as to just what the group is, or where it might be located. Reuters, however, had reported a few days earlier that a Justice Department official claimed that “the co-chairs meet formally every week and talk almost every day to coordinate on a range of investigations,” and that “about 50 staff members are working on the effort, and the task force has identified separate office space in Washington and will move some personnel there.” The Reuters article also noted that the working group “issued more than a dozen civil subpoenas to top financial institutions… [asking] for documents related to mortgage-backed securities offerings between 2006 and 2008.”

Really, it’s hard to believe these two articles are about the same organization.

[Related: Read more columns by Adam Levin]

The RM-BSWG includes representatives from the Justice Department, the SEC, the FBI and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, among others. Its mission is to investigate the securitization and marketing of residential mortgages that contributed to the financial crisis. Presumably, this Group is necessary because the much-ballyhooed $26 billion settlement of the lawsuit brought by 49 state attorneys general and the federal government against the five major banks deals only with mortgage and foreclosure process abuses, such as robo-signing.

Under The Settlement, which was finally approved by a federal judge earlier this month, the banks will reduce the principal on loans held by some now-lucky underwater homeowners, refinance certain mortgages at current and very low rates of interest and compensate the winners of the robo-signing lottery, who lost their homes due to improper foreclosure practices, to the tune of approximately $2,000 apiece. That certainly will pay for a 400 square-foot apartment for a family of four for a couple of months. But most importantly, the settlement does not “Release any criminal liability or grant any criminal immunity,” nor does it “Release any private claims by individuals or any class action claims.”

Bottom line, the Daily News Op-Ed appropriately points out that 12 million homeowners, collectively $700 billion underwater, are in or near foreclosure. Reality check—a $26 billion settlement (only $5 billion of which is in cash) is a relatively insignificant figure given the scope of this disaster. The very existence of the RM-BSWG and the fact that the banks haven’t been released from any criminal liability is an acknowledgement of that.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]


Credit.com’s Credit Report Card
Check your credit bureau profile for free with this great tool. See your detailed credit evaluation, expert advice on managing your credit, and unlimited free updates every 30 days.
Get Started Here »

Let’s, for the moment, take the Daily News Op-Ed with a grain of salt, and give the RM-BSWG the benefit of the doubt. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that they are working hard behind the scenes—actually, let’s pray for that. The politicians who set the group up know full well that perception is reality, and after five years of pain, the fact that the new RM-BSWG has yet to find an office, and that there seems to be no institutional awareness of their mission within government, looks very, very bad. And if this working group really is all hat and no cattle, designed to ameliorate the public for a moment in time which has now passed, let’s stop playing games. Close up shop and leave the real work to the class action lawyers. You better believe that they are sufficiently motivated.

I, for one, hope the RM-BSWG is the real deal. With that in mind, I make the following plea: this is a mission that must be accomplished NOW so please get your act together, guys. In the face of such stark reality, the mere appearance of reality is both immoral and unacceptable.

Image: NationalMortgageSettlement.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team