Home > Personal Finance > Lawmakers Weigh Mobile Wallet Regulation

Comments 1 Comment

In anticipation of a large-scale migration of consumers to a new type of payment technology known as mobile wallets, lawmakers are wondering how best to regulate the industry, or if they should at all.

Late last month, federal lawmakers held a pair of hearings on the future of mobile payments, and the necessity of regulating the rapidly emerging industry was a subject of considerable debate, according to a report from American Banker. On the one hand, those in favor of creating specific regulations for mobile wallet companies say that there are significant gaps between regulations for credit card lenders and payment processors and those for telecommunications companies like cellphone service providers. Consequently, it may be difficult to get companies that create and manage mobile wallet services on the same page as far as what will be required of them. This is especially true because even companies outside these two industries are already developing their own payment platforms.

“There needs to be some cooperation between the wireless and banking regulatory frameworks, because otherwise we’re going to have a mess,” said Suzanne Martindale, a staff attorney for Consumers Union, according to the news site. There is no one clear regulator who is in charge of all mobile payments. It’s very fractured right now. It’s an accident of history that technology moves beyond what’s on the books.”

However, there is also a large contingent which believes that more regulation is unnecessary and even redundant, the report said. They argue that while existing laws may not cover a handful of the complexities involved in bridging the gaps between mobile and financial regulations, these are not so egregious that they couldn’t be covered with patchwork regulations under existing framework. However, even this group concedes that there will need to be cooperation and coordination of regulatory oversight across several federal agencies, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Trade Commission, Federal Communications Commission and more.

[Credit Cards: Research and compare credit cards at Credit.com.]

While mobile wallets are still burgeoning, it’s expected that when widespread adoption hits, it will hit hard. Estimates by outside analysts show that by the end of 2015, the industry could be worth as much as tens of billions annually.

Image: Phil Campbell, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: Lawmakers Weigh Mobile Wallet Regulation | Debt & Credit Blog| Free Online Tips and Resourses()

  • http://www.attochron.com Tom Chaffee

    Having just watched Suzanne Martindale, attorney with Consumers Union give testimony to the House Committee Financial Services (on CSPAN http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/MobileP) a key bit of her testimony spoke volumes. For background, the discussion concerned the evolving ‘ecosystem’ with all the prospective players (i.e. credit card compaines, network owners, content providers…and others) in any financial transaction over mobile.

    The fact that many transactions involve getting a data-based product (a film from Netflix for example) over the network itself is a key dimension — the time/bandwidth aspect. Sounds wonky but almost 90% of the network activity involves ‘big’ data packages (video) being delivered ‘door-to-door’ over wireless broadband networks. And so the amount of avaialble network bandwith (‘capacity’) available for the transaction limits all activity ultimately.

    So Ms. Martinadale mentioned that while the overall number of people doing their banking on mobile is growing exponentially, it is still a relatively small group with few proven ‘business models’. One she noted taking root in Africa (I don’t recall the country offhand) was one where the network operator was itself a sort of bank where the combination of very few people having a pre-existing bank account, but needing phone service ‘forced’ the network operators into playing the role of banker with a good example being a pre-paid calling cards.

    We should note that this model is proven among demographics where the wages are some of the lowest in the world yet there is becoming universal cell phone ownership. That shows the ‘scale’ of the model works at any level.

    So, with the challenging world economy are we ‘looking for complexity’ when a successful business model is already proven? All those in the current value chain might not like the idea but there is a way for everyone to benefit.

    A model exists where the network operator is the financial institution too and (besides actual cash on deposit from pre-paid usage) have available, a ‘gold standard’, the bandwith it can provide in the first place. With loss of network ARPU globally and experts like Tellabs spelling doom for wireless networks because of thinner margins and rising network CAPEX and OPEX, carriers might be wise to take initiative in the global wireless financial opportunity.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team