Home > Mortgages > One Couple That Should Refi, And One That Shouldn’t

Comments 0 Comments

Mortgage rates are at historic lows. So is now a good time to refinance your home loan? It depends. Let’s consider two different couples, one for whom it’s a good idea, and one for whom it may not be.

First off, it used to be that refinancing was a good idea if you could lower your interest rate by at least 100 basis points (1%). This formula is no longer appropriate however, because in the current economy interest rates fluctuate continuously and property values also rise and fall without discrimination. For these reasons, the decision to refinance or not is best made in the context of your overall finances. For example, even if your current rate is not the most competitive, if you can make your loan payments every month and service all of your other debts without any problem, I suggest that you leave well enough alone, especially if your mortgage is close to being paid off. I just don’t think it makes sense to get a new 15- or 30-year loan if you have just 10 years or less left on your existing mortgage. The reason is that if you refinance rather than paying off the loan you have now, you create a new debt with a new term and therefore, you end up making mortgage payments far longer than you originally planned.

If your current mortgage won’t be paid off for many years however, and if it has an interest rate of 7% or more, then refinancing is something to consider — assuming you’ll be able to lower your rate to 5% or less.

To help illustrate, let’s look at two examples from my own practice. John, 35, is an electrical engineer and Mary, 33, is a human resources trainer. Together they earn $160,000 a year. They are in the 10th year of a 30-year, variable rate mortgage, which means that their loan interest rate changes every year based on the index their lender uses; however, the rate won’t go lower than 5% or higher than 9.5%. Right now they are paying 6%. Assuming that John and Mary can refinance into a fixed-rate, 15-year mortgage at 4.5%, they will shave off 1.5% for another 15 years and shorten the term of their loan by 5 years. Clearly, this scenario is a winner for the couple.

Refinancing is not such a good deal for Mike and his wife Janice, however. Mike is a 51 year-old commercial realtor and 50 year-old Janice is an administrative assistant for an attorney. They have a combined annual income of $110,000 and are in the 16th year of a 30-year, fixed-rate 5.5% mortgage. Although their bank tells the couple that they qualify for a 4.75%, 20-year, fixed-rate loan, if they pursue it although they will lower their interest rate by 0.75%, they will end up making mortgage payments for 20 more years rather than the 14 that are remaining on their current loan. Furthermore, their current interest rate is very good, even in today’s market. Looking at the math therefore, Mike and Janice are better off sticking with their current loan.

As you can see, there are no one-size-fits-all answers when it comes to mortgage refinancing. Whether or not refinancing makes sense for someone and the best terms of a refinance need to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Therefore, although opportunities to refinance have never been as attractive as they are today, it’s a good idea to consult with your financial advisor to make sure that making that move is in your best interest, and if it is, to ensure that the loan package you chose is the best one for you.

Image: Bill Ward’s Brickpile, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team