Home > Personal Finance > Proposed Law Would Crack Down on Oklahoma Debt Collectors

Comments 1 Comment

For people upset about unfair or deceptive debt collectors, Oklahoma State Senator Gary Stanislawski believes he has a solution. Stanislawski recently introduced a bill that would clamp down on collectors, forcing the companies to do more to prove that they have the right to collect the amounts they claim.

The bill would also ban the collection of “zombie debt,” which is so old that the statute of limitations has run out, according to a related press release.

But the bill also includes language to limit lawsuits by consumers against collections companies by forcing consumers who file lawsuits that are later found to be frivolous to pay debt collectors’ legal fees. The provision worries some credit experts.

[Free Credit Calculator: Use Credit.com’s Credit Report Card]


Credit Report Card
Check your credit for free with this great tool from Credit.com. It offers expert advice on how to manage your credit. And you can return every 30 days for unlimited free updates.
Sign Up Here »

“That could close the door on lawsuits by consumers with legitimate grievances who don’t dare risk suing a debt collector—even if they’ve broken the law—for fear of running up more debt if they are outgunned,” says Gerri Detweiler, Credit.com’s consumer debt expert.

As proposed, Stanislawski’s bill would require debt collectors in Oklahoma to be licensed and supervised by the state. Collectors would face new documentation requirements, including providing proof to courts and consumers that they actually own the debt, and proof that they informed consumers about collection lawsuits. Companies that buy and sell consumer debt also would be required to transfer all available information about the consumer.

[Credit Cards: Research and compare credit cards at Credit.com]

Those provisions could help prevent mistakes in the collections process, which sometimes have caused companies to try collecting too much money, or collecting it from the wrong person, Detweiler says. Partly as a result, the number of consumers complaining about debt collectors has risen in recent years. Over 144,000 people complained to the Federal Trade Commission about debt collection practices in 2010, the last year for which data is available, a 20-percent increase over the previous year.

The bill “looks like it will bring better consumer protections to Oklahoma citizens who are struggling to pay their bills,” says Detweiler.

You can read the bill itself by clicking on Stanislawski’s here, and searching for Senate Bill 1430.

Image: quaziefoto, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Zoe

    This bill is a perfect example of useless politicians dreaming up redundant legal remedies. Frivolous claims are already subject to sanctions and making the suing party pay attorney fees. Why does his bill not specify that the debt collector must pay the debtor’s attorney fees if the debtor wins? Wny, because politicians look out for big campaign donors, not the constituents who should expect honest and fair dealing in debt collection.

    The politician would serve consumers far better by trying to put a stop to the high interest rate allowed in Oklahoma. The maximum annual rate allowed is 45 percent! Oklahomans should be outraged!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team