Home > 2012 > Identity Theft

Google Wants to Get to Know You Better. Uh-Oh.

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

In case you haven’t heard, Google wants to make life simpler by moving to one company-wide privacy policy.

Yes, that’s right. The company that started out as a little search engine has grown into a behemoth that dabbles in everything from social networking to picture sharing to 3D modeling. And it plans to integrate information pulled from all of those Google services you use to learn more about you.

Here are just a few items of what’s up for grabs: your search preferences, contacts, calendar appointments, and habits based on chats.

Google said its goal with the new policy, scheduled to go live March 1, is to “make those services even better—to show you more relevant search results and ads, to help you connect with people or to make sharing with others quicker and easier.”

Does Google have a choice? Google may be losing ground to Facebook, which poses a serious threat with its hyper-targeted advertising. Google gets fewer clicks for its online ads, according to its fourth quarter report. A new policy would allow it to better capitalize on all the information it has on you.

The bottom line: Google’s new policy should concern you. Typically, consumers look at one thing when it comes to dealing with the privacy practices of many business-to-consumer companies: Does the company share or sell their personal information to other third parties? (Namely marketing companies.)

The answer to that question usually helps consumers decide what, if anything, to share with that business. Whether the company shares that data internally typically isn’t an issue because the scope of the company’s products and services is limited.

That’s not the case when you’re dealing with Google. The fact that Google is only able to share the information it collects within Google gives me as much solace as being told when lost somewhere in the Sahara Desert: Don’t worry, you’re still on Earth, it’s not as if you’re lost somewhere in the Milky Way.

Think about it: Google’s search-engine market share in the U.S. alone is estimated to be roughly 65 percent. Google+ has more than 90 million users. By some estimates between 224 million and 253 million Android devices have been activated, with nearly 700,000 Android activations happening per day, giving Google almost a 50 percent global market share of the smartphone market. Add to this 350 million Gmail users, and the answer as to why Google wants to cross-reference this data becomes clearer.

Consider it this way: Would you be concerned about your privacy if disparate companies suddenly wanted to share information with one another? Imagine if Facebook, Apple, Yahoo Search, Hotmail, Firefox browser, Microsoft Office and MapQuest began to share data they individually collect about you? Oh, and by the way, how that information is being shared, what specifically is being shared, and how you effectively opt out of it is all a bit opaque. But don’t worry, it’s all being done in the name of a “better user experience.” That would be cause for concern or at least questions.

This isn’t the last we’ll hear of Google’s new privacy policy. The issue has garnered bipartisan attention on Capitol Hill and driven Google’s policy manager, Betsy Masiello, to respond in a blog. Wait until the European privacy authorities start looking at this.

You may want to set up a Google alert to keep track of the ongoing news—or, well, maybe not.

Image: Robert Scoble, via Flickr.com

A version of this article originally appeared on Identity Theft 911 on February 1, 2012.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team