Home > Personal Finance > Colorado Bill Would Block Most Credit Checks by Employers

Comments 4 Comments

A controversial law in Colorado that would prevent employers from running checks on potential employees’ credit reports recently passed the state’s Senate.

Colorado Senate Bill 3, which is sponsored by Democratic state senator Morgan Carroll of Aurora, would prevent most companies from running credit checks during the hiring process, but has certain allowances built in for specific industries, according to a report from the Denver Business Journal. Under the provisions of the law, defense and security contractors, as well as financial institutions, would still be able to run credit checks on their applicants.

[Credit Check Tool: Try Credit.com’s Free Credit Report Card]

Proponents of the bill say that because of the recent financial problems suffered by many in the Rocky Mountain State and across the country, the practice of checking credit reports may not be the fairest way to judge an applicant, the report said. This is particularly true due to the previously high unemployment rate, which may have, through no fault of their own, prevented consumers from being as responsible as they might have been in the past.

“In a different time, I probably wouldn’t be supporting this bill. But I do think it’s a different time,” Sen. Rollie Heath, a democrat from Boulder, told the news site. “At this point in time, the balance weighs in favor of those people who are out of work and are in jeopardy of not being able to get a job.”

[Related Article: Can Medical Debts Prevent You From Getting a Job?]

Republicans, meanwhile, say the law effectively makes it harder for employers to make more informed decisions about applicants for open positions, and others have expressed concern over the industries exempted by the bill, the report said. Some also said that the bill may not be a good idea because it essentially does nothing to create new jobs.

All 20 of Colorado’s Senate Democrats voted for the bill, and all 15 of its Republicans voted against it, the report said. With the proposal having passed the Senate, it now moves onto the Republican-controlled House, where its ability to pass is unclear.

Experts and consumer advocates alike have said that the practice of ordering a potential employee’s credit report may be unfair to the applicant in most cases because it may not reveal anything about their character or how trustworthy they are, especially given the state of the economy in the last few years. A number of states already outlaw this practice.

[Featured Products: Compare credit score, report, and monitoring plans at Credit.com]

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Kenneth B Hartwigh

    Credit Checks are an out n out plain and simple invasion of your privacy when done by a prospective employer. I really think it’s just another way for the Human Resource person to justify their existence.
    Your credit score has “absolute zero” to do with whether or not you can perform the job you are applying for. I can understand validation of your educational and previous employments, but your credit? Where and how does that fit into the equation? In Algebra the equation must be equal on both sides. This is surely not the case with a credit check for employment! It, in my book, is just plain being nosie! Next thing you know they’ll be checking your gargage, tapping your phone, monitoring your movementss on GPS and where does the list stop?
    The sorryiest part of the entire affair is that the idiots that are doing this and pushing this kind of crap are so narrow minded that they cannot even percieve that in the future it is their children and their children’s children that are truely going to be paying that bill; not so much our generation, simply because there is a time element involved with getting everyone on the “BANDWAGON!” And probally the most important point of my entire discourse is that once a freedom is lost–as in the “Rico Act” and now the “Patriot Act” they are gone forever! We will never ever get them back short of a “REVELUTION!”
    I hope these people realize that in their innocently trying to hold on to a bullshit job they have just ransomed away their next and all after that generations “FREEDOMS!”

    • P Kennedy

      Actually, as long as you have the SKILLS necessary to DO the job, what jobs you’ve been able to get or not to get in the past shouldn’t matter either. Neither should “what people say about you” i.e. “references,” especially since people LIE. Other than that, agreed.

  • Pingback: Colorado Bill Would Block Most Credit Checks by Employers :: Affordable Mortgage Payment()

  • AJ

    I can understand background check, criminal check, DMV check and previous employment check… but credit check in these times and situation is very unfair. People have bad credits because it takes months to find a decent job therefore they fall behind on their bills. If a company won’t hire them because of bad credit, how are they supposed to pay their bills without a job if you don’t hire them because of bad credit.

    • P Kennedy

      For most or almost all jobs, all of those “checks” should be outlawed because they do nothing but keep people unemployed which keeps them drowning in debt or resorting to crime to keep eating and stay alive. Call centers, for example.

      I mean, back in 2006 when I applied for a call center/typing job, ALL they “checked” was my typing speed and dictation speed. Period. That’s literally ALL that matters, people. Sheesh.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team