Home > Credit Cards > Credit Card Disputes Can No Longer be Taken to Court

Comments 2 Comments

In the past, consumers who had concerns about charges or fees that had been added to their credit card accounts were able to take their lenders to court to dispute them. But thanks to a new ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court, this is typically no longer the case.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled 8 to 1 against consumers’ right to take their credit lenders to court over disputed charges and fees added to their accounts, according to court documents. Instead, they will now almost always be required to take their claims to an arbitrator instead.

That’s because the court believes that the arbitration clauses which are now being included in almost all consumer credit agreements supersede borrowers’ ability to take their claims to court. Previously, a federal law passed in 1996 allowed disputes to be taken before a judge, but this ruling trumps the 15-year-old requirement.

The decision has come under fire from consumer advocates, who say that the arbitration process is less likely to be borrower-friendly, according to a report by National Public Radio. Where a court was more likely to hand down unbiased rulings, independent arbitrators are likely to have a financial stake in siding with lenders.

“Who are you going to favor, the company that might send you more business, or the consumer who you’ll never see again?” Lauren Saunders, the managing attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, told NPR.

Arbitration clauses are included in everything from Research and compare credit cards at Credit.com.]

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.eCredable.com Steve Ely

    This is an important step in a two-step process. Our courts are filled with frivolous lawsuits, of which many are driven by a small number of unscrupolous attorneys looking to make a buck. This helps eliminate some of that. The second step requires the CFPB to step in an make sure the arbitration clauses included in credit card policies are fair and accurate, and fully protect consumers. This process is underway.

  • Kathy

    I purchased a rug in Turkey and when I returned to the States had it appraised. Long story but the rug was not silk or worth near what I had paid. After almost 5 months working with Capitol One, and returning the rug to Turkey at thier suggestion, I have been denied a credit. The reason given was that Visa’s rule if you buy something Face to Face you should be aware of the value. If you buy it online they will stand behind you. What else can I do to protest and fight. I do not understand why they didn’t tell me on day one about the Face to Face rule.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team