Home > Identity Theft > What Facebook’s FTC Settlement Means for Businesses

Comments 0 Comments

Whether you’re a Facebook user, a privacy wonk, or both, you’re likely aware of the social network’s settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, announced this week.

Under terms of the settlement, Facebook must now get users’ permission before it changes the way their personal information is shared. The social network also agreed to submit to privacy audits every two years for the next 20 years.

The settlement shows why it’s so important for companies to build privacy best practices into their business, preferably before the government orders them to do so. This concept—Privacy by Design—was first developed by Dr. Ann Cavoukian, information and privacy commissioner for Ontario, Canada. If Facebook had adopted these practices years ago, it could have avoided run-ins with U.S. and E.U. regulators.

The basic concept is actually quite simple: Companies should include privacy concepts and controls into new products and services during their development stage rather than treating privacy as an afterthought or ignoring it altogether. Companies should think proactively about the life cycle and uses of information collected so they can have clear policies on what they do with the information down the road.

Privacy by Design (PbD) is guided by seven core principles that companies can follow and think of as their privacy “rules of engagement” so to speak. The seven principles are:

1. Proactive not Reactive; Preventative not Remedial

2. Privacy as the Default Setting

3. Privacy Embedded into Design

4. Full Functionality — Positive-Sum, not Zero-Sum

5. End-to-End Security — Full Lifecycle Protection

6. Visibility and Transparency — Keep it Open

7. Respect for User Privacy — Keep it User-Centric

These principles have been embraced by privacy authorities worldwide as the best approach for businesses regarding treatment of sensitive personal information of consumers. Each principle represents core privacy values that, if followed, are good for businesses and consumers. And they keep regulators happy.

I haven’t seen Facebook openly recognize the value of PbD. Maybe it’s because of its unprecedented growth in the last five years. Maybe it’s because as a young, brash company it doesn’t feel the need to have to set its goals regarding privacy very high. Heck, maybe it’s because one of its financial backers is a CIA-owned venture capital group. Or maybe, it’s just because up until recently it hasn’t had to deal with more than negative press and little risk of losing users since it’s really the only game in town.

Regardless of the reason, Facebook is beginning to realize that people still care about their privacy. In the end, that means giving the user control over his information, and making privacy protection easy, clear and a default for users.

Facebook is a good case study for businesses on the costs of ignoring privacy. Downplaying the importance of how you treat and communicate your treatment of consumers’ personal information can be a big mistake. It illustrates why adopting PbD principles early on in a product or service is critical. Mapping out how your company handles these issues early on can prevent later headaches.

Now being a sideline critic is easy and hindsight is 20/20, but Facebook is an easy company to be used as an example on why PbD matters for businesses in the 21st century. Remember Mark Zuckerberg’s self-serving statement, referred to as Zuckerberg’s law: “Every year, people are sharing twice as much information as the previous year.” Even if it’s true, people still care about the control of their information and privacy. And in the end that is really what this FTC settlement and PbD are all about.

A version of this article originally appeared on Identity Theft 911 on Nov. 30, 2011.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team