Home > Personal Finance > Elizabeth Warren Gains on Republican Opponent for Senate

Comments 0 Comments

With the squalls surrounding the filibuster of Richard Cordray’s nomination for director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, it was easy to miss what was going on with Elizabeth Warren, the creator of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Ms. Warren had so infuriated Republicans in Congress that although she was the logical choice for director, the President thought the better part of valor to avoid ideological and personal controversy by choosing Cordray, whose profile is much less political, and whose background more enforcement-oriented.

So Ms. Warren decided to run for Teddy Kennedy’s old seat in the Senate, currently occupied—temporarily—by Scott Brown, a darling of Wall Street. As her campaign got into full swing, some interesting things started to happen. Although early polls indicated that Ms. Warren was substantially behind Mr. Brown, by early December she became the front runner, by a hefty seven point margin; after that happened, Sen. Brown suddenly seemed to come to his more moderate senses, and broke ranks with Republican caucus to vote in favor of the Cordray nomination.

[Article: Who’s Killing the CFPB? We Are.]

That might’ve been strange enough by itself, but things got much stranger very quickly. A group called Crossroads GPS started running an attack ad in Massachusetts against Ms. Warren, portraying Ms. Warren as a tool of Wall Street! It cites her chairmanship of the Congressional Oversight Panel that oversaw the bank bailout in asserting that the bailout was a failure, and that she was responsible for the payment of bonuses to Wall Street executives, and that the Panel committed that most heinous of 21st-century crimes in—it did not create jobs.

Happily, factcheck.org quickly pointed out that the Crossroads video was rife with disinformation, and in general people seem to be laughing off the absurd pot-calls-the-kettle-black attack, particularly because the first Crossroads ad directed against Warren made precisely the opposite point, painting her as a tool of Occupy Wall Street. Crossroads GPS is closely aligned with Karl Rove, the man largely responsible for the brilliant fiscal policy of the Bush 43 administration.

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

Elizabeth Warren started life as a Republican, coming from a somewhat less than middle-class background in Oklahoma. She has earned herself a reputation as a first-class and impassioned consumer advocate, and her history of thought and analytical work earned her a chair at Harvard law school. She openly acknowledges sympathy with the Occupy Wall Street movement, and in fact identifies herself as the creator of the intellectual foundation of the movement. That said, it is also true that she has demonstrated a profound knowledge of the working of the financial system in the United States, and did not oppose the bailout itself. Moreover, she recently declined to endorse the Occupy Harvard petition, to the great surprise of supporter and detractor alike. In other words, Ms. Warren has actually maintained a quite balanced viewpoint for many years; she is ardently pro-consumer, but she is not at all anti-business or anti-Wall Street. Instead, she attacks the excesses of Wall Street, particularly when consumer bears the brunt of those excesses.

In times that are less partisan, she would be seen as middle-of-the-road, but with a gift for passionate rhetoric in defense of the consumer. She understands that the 1%, generally speaking, achieved that status by selling something to the 99%; as the song goes “you can’t have one without the other.”

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for good credit]

Let’s hope that 11 months from now, Ms. Warren is seen for what she is: a hard-working and dedicated public servant who would probably make a better Senator than bureaucrat anyway; a woman whose brains and efforts have earned her status and respect in the academic and policy worlds; and most importantly, a person who has centrist views and thus understands that one not need be anti-business to support and defend the rights of consumers.

Image: U.S. Treasury Department, via Wikimedia Commons

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team