Home > Personal Finance > Watchdog Nominee Advances, Straight into Limbo

Comments 0 Comments

President Obama’s nominee to become the first director of the government’s newest consumer protection agency passed his first test today, as the Senate Banking Committee voted to confirm Richard Cordray, sending his nomination to the full Senate.

The vote split down party lines, with the committee’s 12 Democrats in support and its 10 Republicans opposed. It may be the last movement on Cordray’s bid to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for quite some time, since Senate Republicans have repeatedly stated that they will block any attempt to confirm Cordray to the post.

And Republicans appear prepared to go to extraordinary lengths to follow through on that threat. Already this year, Republican leaders in the House took the highly unusual step of preventing both houses of Congress from officially going into recess, denying President Obama the chance to name Cordray to the job in a recess appointment without Congressional approval.

[Related Article: Senate Stalemate Keeps Consumer Protection Bureau Leaderless]

Prior to the hearing this morning, Obama responded during a press conference to Republicans’ threats to block Cordray’s nomination.

“I’m going to be fighting every inch of the way here in Washington to make sure that we have a consumer watchdog that is preventing abusive practices by the financial sector. I will be hugely supportive of … banks and financial institutions that are doing the right thing by their customers. We need them to be lending,” he said. “But until the American people see that happening, yes, they’re going to continue to express frustrations about what they see as two sets of rules.”

This week, Obama suggested that the new bureau has the power to prevent banks from charging some fees, including Bank of America’s controversial plan to begin charging customers $5 a month to make purchases with their debit cards.

[Related Article: Obama Blasts BofA’s New $5 Fee]

“Well you can stop it,” Obama said. “This is exactly why we need this consumer financial protection bureau that we set up that is ready to go.”

Republicans said the president’s comments support their argument that the bureau and its director have too much unchecked power over the financial products that Americans can buy.

“This week, the President let slip his true vision for the Bureau—to dictate what consumers can buy and how much they will pay,” Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL), said in a prepared statement.

“The President’s comments reveal the grave economic impact that this unchecked bureaucracy could have on the American economy.”

Democrats continued to point out, meanwhile, that the bureau’s powers and budget are limited in ways that other financial regulators are not. And they lauded Cordray’s credentials for the post.

[Featured Product: Need credit monitoring options?]

“I hope my colleagues on the other side of the aisle will set aside partisan ideology and focus on the needs of middle-class Americans,” Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) said in a statement. “Richard Cordray’s distinguished career—Supreme Court clerk, attorney, Ohio Solicitor General, Ohio Treasurer and Ohio Attorney General—has shown he is the right person for the job at the right time for our country. It is time to put this consumer cop on the beat.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has not yet announced any plans to bring Cordray’s nomination to a full Senate vote.

Image: Veronica V photography, via Wikimedia Commons

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team