Home > Mortgages > Texas Counties Seek Millions From Mortgage Company

Comments 1 Comment

A small company that plays an important role in millions of American mortgages is getting sued by a big Texas county for $100 million in unpaid mortgage-filing fees. Today Harris County, which includes Houston, may decide to file a similar lawsuit.

“I mean, it’s huge,” John Odam, assistant county attorney in Harris County Texas, says of the revenue that MERS cost his county. “Our rough estimate of $10 million in damages to Harris County is very conservative.”

The suits could spell big trouble for MERS, which stands for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems. The company, based in Reston, Va., runs an electronic registry of mortgages, tracking which companies own and service the loans.

[Article: Fed: Anti-Foreclosure Programs Can Succeed]

The service allows the financial industry to track home ownership without paying fees to county governments, which typically charge about $35 to record a change in ownership, says Christopher Peterson, associate dean and professor at the University of Utah’s law school. In the modern mortgage economy, where loans are bundled together and sold as investments, most mortgages pass between four to six different owners from the original lender all the way to the investor who eventually buys it.

With millions of loans being written each year, and each one changing hands multiple times, that translates to hundreds of millions of dollars in fee revenue that traditionally would have gone to county governments, but which now does not.

Dallas County District Attorney alleges that it still should. The county filed suit against MERS in September, arguing that the company owes the county between $58 million and $100 million.

“There should have been filing fees paid when these mortgage-backed securities were transferred,” says Craig Watson, district attorney for Dallas County. “And they circumvented that process.”

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

In the past, MERS has defended its actions as legal. In response to a story by the Tampa Bay Times, Karmela Lejarde, a spokeswoman for MERS, defended the company. “It is important to note that there are numerous cases upholding the legal validity of MERS,” she said.

The cases are important because MERS “pretends to own about 60 percent of all residential mortgages in the U.S.,” Peterson says. The company claims ownership so that mortgage companies don’t have to go to the expense of filing documents and paying about $35 every time a mortgage changes hands, he says. If a homeowner defaults, MERS files an assignment giving the owners of the mortgage the right to foreclose.

The problem, Peterson says, is that this is all just an elaborate shell game. In reality, MERS never takes ownership of the mortgage, which means the company can’t assign the right to foreclose to anyone.

“I think these assignments are just gibberish,” says Peterson. “MERS doesn’t own anything so they don’t have the right to assign anything.”

The Harris County Commissioners Court will decide today whether to proceed with a lawsuit.

[Featured Product: Need credit monitoring options?]

Image: Rishabh Mishra (possible248), via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: Banks May Still Face Fraud, Municipal Claims Under Foreclosure Settlement – Bloomberg | Attorney Loans()

  • Pingback: Banks May Face Fraud, Municipal Claims After Foreclosure Accord – San Francisco Chronicle | Attorney Loans()

  • http://TheBelovedCommunity.org Heather Eck

    This is a PERFECT example of what the Occupy Wall Street movement is trying to raise awareness about!!! Who knows about this issue and the detrimental domino effect this loss of funding is having in counties all over our country? I never had until now. So millions of dollars that should be going into a county’s budget for community services is now rerouted into the pockets of the already rich mortgage companies/banks, basically robbing communities of needed financial revenue & forcing them to cut services in order to balance their budgets. As a result, local governments request more funding from the federal government resulting in increased debt… & it just keeps snowballing while the rich get richer & undermine the well-being of communities across the nation — and no one knows about this!!! This is outrageous & should make all of us belonging to the 99% rise up and and protest!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team