Home > Mortgages > Fed Study: Foreclosure Aftermath Maybe Not So Bad After All

Comments 1 Comment

A study published last May by researchers at the Federal Reserve has been getting a bit of buzz of late due to its surprising findings about the nature of the foreclosure crisis. The paper acknowledges that the crisis is widespread, but also suggests that the quality of life in the aftermath of a foreclosure may not be as painful as many of us might have assumed.

The paper, called “The Post-Foreclosure Experience of U.S. Households” was written by Raven Molloy and Hui Shan, and the ideas in it do not represent the position of the Fed or members of its Board of Governors. This paper, and others like it that the Fed publishes, are designed to stimulate discussion. And this one is doing just that.

[Article: Another Bad Idea to Help the Housing Market]

A nearly incredulous Joel Sucher recently wrote about the paper at American Banker. Sucher is a documentary filmmaker working on a film about foreclosure and observed:

“It seemed that these intrepid statisticians had entered a no-man’s land of sorts, proclaiming that not much has been done to study the lives of those who have involuntarily left their homes…. On the face of it, foreclosure couldn’t be a good thing, could it? You didn’t have to be a scientist or statistician to figure that one out. But Shan and Molloy did uncover a happy face of sorts. The foreclosed weren’t quite as bad off as you’d expect.”

Now, we should clarify that no one at the Fed is suggesting that a foreclosure isn’t a traumatic experience, and that experience is unfortunately being shared by a significant number of Americans, as the chart below demonstrates.

foreclosure statistics

That said, the key findings in this paper are surprising on some level. Here they are, for your consideration:

  1. “Only about half of borrowers whose mortgage enters foreclosure have moved even two years later, suggesting that many foreclosures are worked out through refinancing or other means.” (Another thing to consider is that the foreclosure process often takes longer than two years. In New York and New Jersey, the average duration of a foreclosure is more than 900 days.)
  2. “As for borrowers who do move after a foreclosure, they do not seem to end up in substantially more crowded living conditions or less-desirable neighborhoods.”
  3. “Although foreclosure increases the probability that an individual will move to a multifamily building, most post-foreclosure migrants remain in single-family structures.”
  4. “Their new neighborhood does not have significantly lower median income, median house value, or median rent than their old neighborhood. Given that housing unit quality is highly correlated with neighborhood affluence, our evidence suggests that post-foreclosure migrants do not move to substantially lower quality housing units.”

[Tool: Quickly assess your risk of identity theft for free]

So what does all of this add up to? The paper goes on to say that the evidence suggests that, “on average, the post-foreclosure reduction in housing consumption is relatively minor.” In other words, as painful as the foreclosure process may be, not to mention the contributing factor that may have led to the foreclosure (loss of job, illness), the paper posits that post-foreclosure living situations aren’t too dissimilar from pre-foreclosure living situations.

The authors do suggest that their methodology may have created some gaps in their reporting. For example, the study makes the general assumption that when a foreclosure causes someone to move to a new house in the same neighborhood, it’s likely that the house is similar to their previous house in terms of size and quality. They note, however, that “it is possible that we define neighborhoods too broadly, thereby overlooking significant within-neighborhood variation in housing unit quality. In this case, post-foreclosure borrowers could be moving to smaller, lower quality housing units in neighborhoods that appear to be no worse than their original neighborhood.”

They study is definitely interesting, and though its findings may well be offensive to someone actually going through a foreclosure, it’s no less worth examining. The foreclosure crisis has been devastating to millions of families, but there’s no shortage of houses (for now anyway) and we don’t see tent cities popping up in Central Park and elsewhere as there was during the Great Depression. But there are exceptions elsewhere in the United States—see recent stories about tent cities in New Jersey and Virginia, for example—and the rise of a different kind of tent city in lower Manhattan is evidence of just how strongly people feel about the overall state of the economy, particularly the wide gap between the haves and have nots.

If you’re going through a foreclosure, or fear that you may be facing one in the future, please share your story in the comments section. Do the findings in the Fed paper surprise you? Are they missing anything? We want to hear from you.

[Featured Product: Get a free trial credit score]

Image: TheMuuj, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://absolutetotalfreedom.blogspot.com/ absolutetotalfreedom

    Republicans will continue to put the failed economic policies of GWB that caused the mortgage debacle on the present President, but I know most voters are smart enough to see through their smoke and mirrors!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team