Home > Mortgages > Fed: Anti-Foreclosure Programs Can Succeed

Comments 1 Comment

By now the government knows how to create a program that totally stinks at preventing foreclosures. As we reported late last year, the federal government’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), aimed to help up to 4 million people avoid foreclosure has been an abject failure, and its performance hasn’t improved in the ten months since.

But the government isn’t powerless to reverse the continuing tide of homeowners losing their houses, according to a new report by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. The researchers found that a few simple factors, including getting started early in the foreclosure process and forcing mortgage servicers to participate, determine which programs work and which don’t.

[Related Article: HAMP Fails to Save Homeowners from Foreclosure]

“By getting both lenders and homeowners to the table, foreclosure mediation has been somewhat successful at finding alternatives to foreclosure,” says Robert Clifford, author of the report.

One reason why HAMP has failed is that servicers don’t have to participate, according to a study by the Congressional Oversight Panel. Instead, the program uses cash incentives to pay servicers for modifications. But the payments are too small compared to the incentives servicers have to push homes into foreclosure, according to the Center for Responsible Lending.

Forcing servicers to participate may lead to better outcomes, the Fed found. Nevada is one of several states that allow lenders to foreclose without going to court. But borrowers can request that their pending foreclosure be handled by a state-run mediation program. If the lender refuses, the borrower can request a judicial review, which can lead to court sanctions.

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

“This may partially explain why Nevada has reported more successful mediation outcomes than any other non-judicial foreclosure state,” the Boston Fed found.

Also important: foreclosure programs need to start early. Too often, government programs wait to be contacted by homeowners, sometimes after the foreclosure process has dragged on for months. In that time the homeowner’s savings accounts and credit rating may have been trashed, limiting their options for saving their homes.

“In the case of mediation, this means contacting homeowners when a foreclosure complaint is filed and facilitating conversations between lenders and borrowers early and often,” the study found. “Such efforts shepherd preventable foreclosures out of the pipeline.”

[Featured Product: Shopping for secured credit cards?]

Image: rokabiri, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Mark

    The simplest way to fight foreclosure is to understand what happened to the mortgage note. It was sold into a security. In that process it went through several entities each of which were to assign the note to the next entity in line. Then the note is in a pool of notes which is called a security or certificate. That security or certificate was sold to an investor, usually another bank or insurance company. So Joe defaults on his loan and the original lender who is now JUST A DEBT COLLECTOR bluffs and lies in the foreclosure process. So when you get the foreclosure complaint…ANSWER IT WITH DISCOVERY. You want to know…who has possession of the original note? Are all assignments present? All indorsements present? (Yes indorsements with an “i”) Was it all notarized properly? How did they get the mortgage note? Meaning did they pay for it? This will stop most foreclosures! Don’t believe me! Do your own research and see how banks are losing everyday to people who challenge them to their lies. There is a reason bank stocks are in the toilet. There is a reason all of the major banks are being sued by the US Govt. There is a reason both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are in receivership. The banks fear the educated. FIGHT THE BANKS. Make them show standing. Let them know you will do a forensic examination on the supposed “original” note. That FREAKS them out!

  • Pingback: Were We Inevitably Screwed? | Man Are We Screwed()

  • Pingback: Real Estate Buzz - Choose Your Chiseler()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team