Home > Credit Cards > Harzog: Capping Credit Card Swipe Fees Could Be Bad for Consumers

Comments 0 Comments

Now that the retail lobby in Washington sort of got what they wanted with the cap on debit card interchange fees, they’re ready for a new challenge. According to this story from The Hill, limiting the interchange fees on credit cards is the next target. The interchange fee is the fee that retailers have to pay the banks when you pay for an item with a credit card.

This is so bad for consumers on so many levels, I hardly know where to begin. Listen, I know it feels good to stick it to the banks. I totally get that. I’m a consumer advocate, for crying out loud. But limiting the interchange fee on credit cards isn’t a win for consumers.

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

In case you haven’t followed this story, the Durbin Amendment was the legislation that placed a cap on what banks can charge merchants for debit card interchange fees. I think Durbin had the best of intentions. I really believe that. But the market doesn’t stand still for price controls. It just doesn’t. You put a limit on one fee, and another fee pops up and punches you in the nose.

[Article: What the Debit Card Interchange Rules Mean For Consumers]

Think about this: To make up for the lost revenue on debit card interchange fees, banks are starting to charge monthly fees if you use your debit card. That’s an example of a new fee popping up to replace the lost revenue. There are exceptions, of course. The Credit CARD Act of 2009 is an example of legislation that helped consumers. Yes, a few new fees popped up. But before the CARD Act, the credit card industry was like the Wild West. The CARD Act added some much-needed protection to consumers. It’s far from perfect and there are still plenty of loopholes, but it was a good start.

Once it sunk in that the CARD Act would likely happen, we saw interest rates rise because issuers wanted to get as much revenue as possible before the regulations took place. I’d expect to see similar jockeying for revenue if the push to cap the interchange fees on credit cards gets very far. This would be a terrible blow to consumers who are using credit cards to make ends meet right now.

It’s About Them, Not You

This latest idea to cap the interchange fees on credit cards isn’t about helping you. It’s about retailers trying to save themselves money. Nothing wrong with that. The retail industry is an important part of a healthy economy and I understand they’re hurting.

But in this case, and this is pointed out in the aforementioned story in The Hill, retailers really do gain an advantage from accepting credit cards. Consumers spend more money when using credit cards. The retailers are the only ones who stand to gain and consumers will end up paying for it.

I think that’s a dastardly thing to do to consumers in this economy. The retailers say they can pass on savings to the consumer. Oh, really? I’d like that in writing, please.

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

What You Can Do to Protect Yourself

This whole issue is just getting started. You can count on me to keep an eye on this. In the meantime, be sure you read all your mail from your credit card issuer. If you’re being hit with a rate increase or some other crazy fee, you want to know as soon as possible.

And remember, whether you get new fees on your debit card or on your credit card, you don’t have to take it. You’re the consumer and you’re in charge of your financial life.

[Featured Product: Need credit monitoring options?]

Image: Erik Ostrom, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team