Home > Credit Score > Why Your Lender is Using an Older Credit Scoring Model

Comments 1 Comment

Companies that develop credit scores have a strong interest in making sure the credit scoring systems they provide to the industry are as predictive and robust as possible so that lenders will opt to select and use their credit scoring system when evaluating the potential risk of their customers. This is especially critical in today’s tight credit market where lenders are extremely cautious about extending new credit.

[Related Article: New Credit Score Could Help Millions, Eventually]

One way scoring companies accomplish this goal is by periodically redeveloping the models that generate the credit score. Generally speaking, scoring companies will update their credit scoring system every three to five years and release that new version to the market. Both FICO and VantageScore have released updated score versions in the last several years. Lenders are encouraged, but not necessarily required, to evaluate and adopt the newer version.

For comparison’s sake, think about how a software developer will periodically update and release new versions of their products and services.  The basic features and functionality of the product remain relatively the same (Windows 7 vs. Windows Vista, for example), but the new offering usually includes enhancements that improve its value. While consumers are encouraged to upgrade to the newest version, not all people do—or will do so at a later date.

The same holds true for credit scores, but it is less apparent to consumers how and when this takes place, as each lender and various entities (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, for example) determine whether they will transition to the updated score version. They don’t necessarily communicate what version of the credit score they are using.

An added layer of complexity comes into play now that all consumers can go out and directly request their own credit score and credit report. The version a consumer may obtain directly on his or her own may differ from other scores provided by lenders, such as the credit score version used in a lender’s risk-based pricing notification.

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for bad credit?]

Why Redevelop the Credit Scores?

Credit score developers like FICO and VantageScore frequently validate and test their credit scoring systems to ensure they effectively predict future credit risk. The scores are designed to remain robust and stable and to hold up over micro and macro-level changes. The fundamental credit behaviors that were predictive of high risk credit behavior in the past continue to be very predictive of future credit risk today. Namely—consumers who don’t pay bills on time, heavily utilize a lot of their available credit, and frequently apply for credit continue to represent high credit risk today as in the past.

At the same time, the scores need to be updated to ensure they reflect more recent consumer credit practices, accommodate new types of credit offerings and reporting practices, and can incorporate new and advanced analytic techniques the score developers have been researching and testing since the last version released to market.

For example, the first versions of the FICO scores did not factor “rate shopping logic” into the scores that consider consumers’ rate shopping trends when inquiring into auto, mortgage and student loans. The consumer-friendly rate shopping treatment logic was incorporated into later versions of the FICO score and is now considered a “standard” feature in all credit scores.

Another example: The more recent versions also reflect the fact that all consumers (high risk and low risk alike) use more credit today compared to the early 1990s. Consider that the growing use of credit cards to pay for groceries, stamps, and to make bill payments online is a relatively recent development. As such, newer score versions likely weight credit card usage patterns differently compared to previous versions.

The result of the redevelopment effort is a credit scoring system that is more predictive and more reflective of recent consumer credit and reporting dynamics—thereby providing a better score for lenders and consumers.

[Resource: Get your free personalized Credit Report Card]

Converting to the Newer Score Version »

Image: Annie Pilon, via Flickr.com

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Pingback: New Credit Score Could Help Millions, Eventually()

  • Pingback: New Credit Score Could Help Millions, Eventually | Gov Grants()

  • Devin Bent

    A big problem with Vantagescore:

    Through a service purchased from USSA I have daily access to my scores and the underlying reports. These are — as I understand it — Vantagescores. I have found one lender — USAA — who uses the Vantagescores for mortgage decision-making. For reasons not pertinent here, I can’t use USSA.

    How do I find another institution that uses Vantagescores. I emailed and phoned Vantages scores — the first email two days ago without any answer at all. I asked USAA. They don’t know.

    If I call individual lenders, the people who answer phones or email and their supervisors don’t know anything. Even the persons who talk loans don’t seem to know about scores except that they use some. I can’t have them do hard pulls — I’ll just rack up hard pulls and destroy my credit rating.

    I read a Vantage press release that Chase uses them. I went to the Chase website and used their estimator that asks for FICO.

    So have I bought scores that can be used with only one lender?

  • Pingback: Credit Handbook of Credit Scoring Book Reviews Credit | Credit Insurance Tips()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team