Home > Personal Finance > To Prevent More Bailouts, Big Banks Must File Living Wills

Comments 0 Comments

Nearly three years after Wall Street firms brought the world economy to its knees, a government regulator passed new rules this week that it hopes will end the phenomenon of “Too Big to Fail” by giving taxpayers the option of liquidating giant banks instead of bailing them out.

The rules, approved Wednesday by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation, require large financial institutions to write their own “living wills.” These documents will attempt to make sense of the dizzyingly complex, overlapping and sometimes competing business operations owned by bank holding companies like JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs.

[Tool: Quickly assess your risk of identity theft for free]

The plans also will lay out how those pieces can be extricated from one another and disposed of separately, either by selling them off, recombining them into new companies, or sending them squealing into bankruptcy.

“These two rules will ensure the comprehensive and coordinated resolution planning for both the insured depository and its holding company and affiliates in the event that an orderly liquidation is required,” the ever-quotable Martin J. Gruenberg, acting chairman of the FDIC, said in a press release.

There are two different rules for two different types of companies. One, for bank holding companies, sends the corporate unraveling through the bankruptcy court system. The other, which covers the nation’s 37 largest depository banks, each of which has $50 billion or more in assets, would place the FDIC in the role of receiver, giving it the power to dismantle and reorganize the different assets without going through the bankruptcy process.

[Featured Product: Shopping for secured credit cards?]

The economic system doesn’t have to be headed down the toilet for the living wills to begin helping, however. Corporations must file their wills annually, giving regulators the chance to spot places in the financial system where risk is being concentrated. (Had such documents been available before the crash, for example, someone might have noticed that letting the same company, AIG, create mortgage-backed investments while simultaneously insuring them might cause a wee little problem—or a $182-billion taxpayer bailout—should mortgage default rates creep up.)

As we covered in June, banks and their lobbyists balked at the new regulations, saying that living wills could be misused by competitors. The rules “should not create a system that manages for failure rather than for success,” according to a letter to the FDIC by the American Bankers Association and five other industry associations.

Because of this lobbying pressure, the FDIC agreed to postpone the due date for the first living wills from sometime in 2011 back to the new deadline of July 1, 2012 for the largest banks and July 1, 2013 for smaller but still-huge ones.

[Related article: Bloomberg: The Secret Bailout? Secret Fed Program Lent Big Banks $1.2 Trillion]

Image: Ken Mayer, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team