Home > Mortgages > New Watchdog Agency to Target Mortgage Servicers

Comments 1 Comment

The leader of America’s consumer watchdog agency for financial products explained his view of problems plaguing the mortgage servicing industry on Tuesday, and gave some hints about what changes his agency might make to ensure that homeowners are protected in the legal system.

Raj Date, interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, said in a speech to American Banker magazine’s regulatory symposium that the current system harms homeowners by encouraging mortgage insurers to cut costs and, when necessary, cut consumers off.

“A servicer can, in a sense, ‘fire’ a borrower; but a borrower can’t fire a servicer,” Date said. “That reduces the incentive for servicers to treat borrowers properly.”

[Related Article: In First Public Speech, Consumer Watchdog Lays Out His Plans]

Mortgage servicers function as unseen but immensely powerful members of the mortgage industry. They handle the monthly payments from home buyers, pay the taxes and insurance, and pass on the rest to investors. They also are charged with handling the foreclosure process when loans go into default.

A main problem, Date said, is that borrowers and their servicers often have competing interests. In some mortgage servicing contracts, servicers actually make more money by forcing homeowners into foreclosure than by helping them modify their mortgage and stay in the home, because in foreclosure the servicer gets to charge excessive fees to maintain the property. Also, in most states, a house falling into foreclosure changes the order of payment. Instead of waiting for the lender and city property taxes to get paid, in foreclosure the servicer usually gets paid first, as we detailed here.

As a result, servicers didn’t invest in the technology and staffing required to handle the onslaught of foreclosure cases that came their way after the housing bubble burst, Date said.

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

For years, federal regulators operated on the assumption that companies would play by the rules, Date said. The robosigner scandal showed that wasn’t true, since many of the largest mortgage servicing companies employed people to forge thousands of court documents a day in a last-ditch effort to cover up missing paperwork.

After that experience, regulators can no longer depend on companies’ good intentions, Date said.

“Consumer finance is a $20 trillion business, and you should not pretend that every actor in the business is playing by the rules,” he said. “If there is not adequate enforcement, you should not expect rules to be abided by.”

[Featured Product: Shopping for secured credit cards?]

Date didn’t announce any rules that the bureau is considering to rein in alleged servicer abuses. But he did point out that the bureau’s mere existence is a step in the right direction, since the previous regulatory scheme was so complicated, and varied so much from state to state and agency to agency, that it allowed corporations to shop for the cheapest regulator.

Now that the bureau’s consumer protection rules apply evenly, across all states and all major financial institutions, such shopping around should come to an end, Date said.

“During the housing bubble, our fragmented system of mortgage regulation, supervision, and enforcement produced an unlevel playing field that encouraged irresponsible lenders to shop for the most permissive legal regime. The opportunity for regulatory arbitrage accelerated a race to the bottom in lending standards,” he said. Fortunately, the Bureau has been charged with making consumer financial markets work better for all consumers, regardless of who they do business with.”

Image: woodleywonderworks, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.guardianppiclaims.co.uk/ PPI Refund

    Generally, states that use mortgages conduct judicial foreclosures; states that use deeds of trust conduct non-judicial foreclosures.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team