Home > Identity Theft > Strange But True: A “Phishy” Email Proves Legit

Comments 0 Comments

With so many scam artists and identity thieves infiltrating the web these days, I’ve learned to become extremely suspicious of any emails, Facebook messages and direct “tweets” requesting personal identifying information. I automatically filter all spam messages and delete any and all online communication requesting my Social Security number, bank account information or credit card number. If anyone needs my information that badly, they can just call me.

But recently, my ID theft radar made a false assumption—and I don’t think I’m alone.

A few months back I received a detailed email from a syndication executive at “Condé Nast Independent Magazine” in South Africa. She wrote to me saying that my feature article originally published in the U.S. version of Glamour last October was being reprinted in the April 2011 issue of Glamour South Africa. The magazine wanted to pay me the “agreed fee” of $68.80. But—and this was what threw me off—in order to receive the money, I needed to respond with my bank name and account number, among other confidential information. It was odd.  I’ve scannedthe email from Glamour South Africa here. Doesn’t it seem strange?

[Article: The Epsilon Breach – Don’t Take the Bait With Phishing Scams]

I tapped the expertise of Ondrej Krehel, Information Security Officer at Credit.com’s sister company, Identity Theft 911, and even he thought it was an unusual email. Ondrej looked into the source of the email address from South Africa and found that it did, indeed, originate from an IP address in Johannesburg. It was most likely sent from a DSL connection, registered by Condé Nast Independent Magazine at this web hosting platform, he said.


A similar—though, more unusual—request also arrived in my inbox weeks later from an employee at Glamour Mexico. This time, there was no text in the body of this email, just an attached Excel spreadsheet detailing the reuse of my article and that, in order to get paid, I needed to provide my bank account info.

Were these spam messages? My gut said yes, but I couldn’t ignore the fact that the messages were catered to me; they were addressed as “Dear Farnoosh,” and provided the word length and page number of my article, which did, in fact, run in the October 2010 issue of Glamour in the U.S.  The senders also went on to include their contact information, and according to this link, Condé Nast does have a relationship with Condé Nast Independent Magazines in South Africa and Mexico.

Confused, I contacted Condé Nast and an international permissions manager confirmed these emails were, indeed, valid. But, I asked, was there any other way to receive my paycheck without emailing my personal bank account information and having the money wired? I don’t feel comfortable, I explained. Can they just send me a check?

Unfortunately, how the international titles make payment is entirely up to them, I was told. In the meantime, the manager said she would forward my concerns and the unusual emails I received to the international affiliates for their review. “Our international affiliates should approach our contributors in such a way as to inspire confidence, not doubt,” she said.

I appreciate that, but in the meantime, I’m not following up on those emails. The $68.80 is not important enough to worth risk placing my personal information in an email—even if my info is going to a trusted source. How do I ensure it won’t cross the wrong set of eyes?

My other main concern is, how many other Condé Nast freelancers have received similar emails and forgone a paycheck that is rightfully owed to them?

[Fraud Resource: Free Identity Risk Score and personal risk profile]

Image: www.glamour.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team