Home > 2011 > Mortgages

Senators: Jumbo Mortgages Still Need Taxpayers’ Help

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

A trio of powerful senators introduced a bill this week that would extend a major government subsidy for the ailing real estate market. If passed, the law would allow taxpayer-owned mortgage companies to continue buying jumbo mortgages, worth up to $729,750.

If the bill, or one like it, fails to pass before the end of the Congressional session in September, the law would revert back to its old, lower limit. That could further damage the market for new and exiting homes, the senators warned.

[Featured Product: Looking for bad credit credit cards?]

“Allowing existing loan limits to expire during this difficult economic time would make a struggling housing market even weaker,” Johnny Isakson (R-GA) said in a press release. “I am also concerned that failing to extend these limits will make it even more difficult for the average homebuyer get a mortgage and buy a home when credit is already tight.”

At issue is the definition of “conforming” mortgages, which are loans that can be bought from lenders by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Veterans Administration and the Federal Housing Administration. Under the regular rules, the government cannot buy any loan worth more than $625,000.

In February 2008, President Bush signed the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, which increased the maximum limit to $729, 750 in areas with the most expensive housing. The measure was supposed to be temporary. But if the bill introduced by Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Johnny Isakson (R-GA) and Barbara Boxer (D – CA) passes, that “temporary” rule won’t expire until 2013.

The cap is supposed to make sure that taxpayers are not subsidizing wealthy homeowners. But in some parts of the country, bringing back the old limits could hurt regular consumers, the senators argue.

[Related Article: Senate Considers Ways to Bring Trust Back to Mortgages]

The effects could be terrible,” Menendez said in a press release. “New Jersey has some of the highest home prices in the nation and allowing these limits to lapse would hurt middle class homeowners and prospective buyers.”

The measure appears to have broad support in Washington. In addition to the bipartisan sponsorship, an increasingly rare occurrence in the current Congress, the Obama administration published a white paper in February that called for the subsidy for jumbo loans to be extended.

Image: Sam Bowman, Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Kevin

    Senator Isakson is/was a realtor. It takes a lot of chutzpah to proclaim that people buying houses that only 5% of the country can afford should have taxpayers subsidize them. To claim that ending such an absurd subsidy would hurt the middle class is outright b.s.

    The other senator who is complaining about how high home prices are… well, you don’t need to take an Econ class to be a shill for a criminal lobbying firm like NAR. How these cockroaches sleep at night is beyond me.

  • Pingback: Feds’ Practices Limiting Availability of Pricier – and More Lucrative – Homes | RE Insider()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team