Home > Mortgages > Score Disclosure Notices: Not Viable for Tracking Your Score Over Time

Comments 0 Comments

As I recently blogged, lenders are now required to supply potential borrowers with their credit scores if they are denied credit or offered less favorable terms because of those scores, thanks to credit score disclosure rules that became effective July 21st. If you’ve applied for credit since then, you may have already received a letter with your score as part of the lender’s meeting their risk based pricing notification obligation or—unfortunately for you, their adverse action notification obligation.

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for bad credit?]

I have heard some people thinking they can leverage these score disclosure notifications as a means (at no cost) to track their credit score’s migration over time.  Unfortunately, these notices should not be used for that purpose as the results would be misleading.  There are several reasons why this is the case.

Three Bureaus, Three Scores

Most of the time the lender pulls your credit report and score from only one of the three national credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian and TransUnion) when you apply for a loan.  The exception tends to be for mortgage related loans where all three credit reports and credit scores are accessed.  Each lender has their own criteria and rules to determine from which credit reporting agency they will access the report and score.

As such, if you have received several score disclosure notices from different lenders, they are likely accessing the credit score they disclose to you from different credit reporting agencies.  Your credit score can be different across the credit reporting agencies when the underlying data housed on you at the credit reporting agency is different.

So you should not assume the 680 score within your first notice has increased if the score shared in the second notice is 710 for example.

[Related: New Rules Increase Free Access to Credit Scores]

Different Scoring Models

There are different scoring models that lenders use.  The two most commonly used broad based risk scores are the FICO score (may be referenced as BEACON in your score disclosure letter if the lender used Equifax) and the VantageScore.  These scores have different score ranges – FICO scores generally range between 300-850 while VantageScores range between 501-990.

So you should not assume the 680 VantageScore within your first notice has decreased if the FICO score shared in the second notice is 670 for example.

Different Versions of the Same Scoring Model

To complicate matters even more, there are different versions of the FICO and VantageScore models available for lenders to use.  Similar to how there are multiple versions of Microsoft operating systems in use, there are multiple releases of the credit scores lenders can access and use.  The score developers periodically update and enhance their credit scoring systems and lenders then determine if and when they will migrate to a newer release.

So you should not assume the 680 FICO version “X” within your first notice has stayed the same if the FICO score shared in the second notice is also 680 — but calculated from FICO version “Z” — for example.

[Related: CFPB Study: Consumers, Lenders Not Looking at Same Credit Scores]

While these score disclosures do not provide you with the opportunity to track your score over time, they are valuable. They provide transparency on how lenders evaluated your request for credit and provide insights into the credit score the lender used so that you can understand where you rate and take action to increase your score if needed.

Image by mollycakes, via Flickr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team