Home > 2011 > Auto Loans

Regulator Hears of Car Dealers Scamming Soldiers

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

A car dealer tells an Army soldier that the perfect car is sitting on a distant lot. They ride there together in a van, but the van leaves. If the soldier fails to return to base soon, he will be reported as AWOL. The soldier is stuck, so he buys the car.

This scenario plays out time and again on car lots near U.S. military bases, Holly Petraeus, chief of servicemember affairs for the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, said this week at a federal hearing in San Antonio. Soldiers are often targeted by car dealers because “their salary is absolutely rock-solid and it will be paid twice a month,” Petraeus said.

It was the second of two rounds of hearings conducted by the Federal Trade Commission to investigate alleged abuses by car dealers against active members of the military.  The hearings were covered by the Center for Public Integrity, which first broke the scandal of car dealers ripping off soldiers in an investigative report in April.

Other common scams include tacking hidden interest rate increases onto car loans, and overcharging soldiers for options, witnesses told the FTC. In once case, a dealership hid the actual loan costs by printing two different sets of paperwork, Dwain Alexander II, an attorney with the Navy Legal Service Office, told the panel.

[Article: Holly Petraeus, Military Family Watchdog Slated for Consumer Protection Agency Post]

The dealership charged the same service member $2,700 for a GPS system worth only $200.

This week’s hearings in San Antonio, and hearings held in Detroit in April, were held by the FTC to investigate allegations that car dealers actively target soldiers for scams. Getting a loan through a dealer may give consumers the opportunity to shop for a cheaper loan from multiple lenders, the FTC said in a press release announcing the hearings.

“Dealer-arranged financing, however, can be a complicated, opaque process and could potentially involve unfair or deceptive practices,” the commission said.

A number of investigations have detailed how servicemembers are sometimes targeted by overzealous car dealers. One of the first was conducted by the Center for Public Integrity’s David Heath, who found that car dealers are secretly increasing loan interest rates and lying on loan applications about the car’s value and the buyer’s income, practices recently outlawed in the mortgage industry.

Banks often offer incentives for dealers to increase the interest rates on car loans, over and above the rates for which consumers actually qualify, according to the Center for Responsible Lending.

“In the case of interest rate markups, it adds an estimated $25.8 billion to the cost of car loans, raising the chance of default and repossession, especially among subprime borrowers,” according to a press release by the center.

At the FTC hearing in San Antonio, car dealers testified that such complaints are old news, and that the industry has changed significantly in recent years.

“To the extent there is an abuse somewhere, that’s an exception, not the norm,” Mercer said. While a few “bad players” still exist, the impression of car dealers as scammers is a holdover from “bygone years,” said Mercer.

[Featured Product: Compare prepaid credit cards]

Image: Mr. T in DC, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • LordRussell

    Banking institutions & dealerships will always disavow wrong doing under the guise of loopholes under whatever the current laws dictate, knowing full well the the gut-punches of nausea to their mid sections are indeed the gnawing pains of truly knowing right from wrong.

    I was stationed in San Antonio & being one of the ‘older’ soldiers I could sway some of the younger soldiers from making some mistakes, but temptations are thicker than flies one a 3 day old battle field and it simply seems that both the guilty & innocent can’t help themselves. Radical as it may seem, taking a Buford T Pusser approach & setting fire to a few of these shysters base of operations where they stand might curtail some of what ails us all, not just the military.

    But then someone equally, but oppositely radical would retort that evil begets evil & starts a completely different debate & then where would we be? Oh yeah, that hippie would be paying $100 for a stick of gum…

  • Pingback: Do Bad Credit Car Dealers Exist in Kansas City? | MoKan Autos()

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team