Home > Personal Finance > Fed: Loans to Poor People Did Not Cause Crisis

Comments 0 Comments

In the debate over who caused the financial crash of 2008, some argue that it was poor people. Specifically, as people including Peter Wallison of the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute argue, government requirements that banks give mortgages to people who couldn’t afford to repay them forced a broad loosening of lending rules, which led to the collapse.

“If the U.S. government had not chosen this policy path—fostering the growth of a bubble of unprecedented size and an equally unprecedented number of weak and high-risk residential mortgages—the great financial crisis of 2008 would never have occurred,” Wallis wrote on page two of his 100-page dissent from the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission’s final report.

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for bad credit?]

There’s only one problem with this argument, the Federal Reserve says: It’s wrong. According to research by two top Fed economists, mortgages given to low- and moderate-income homebuyers under the government’s rules actually performed a tad better than other loans through the downturn.

At issue is the Community Reinvestment Act, which broadly requires banks with branches in low-income areas to give loans in those areas. It also applies to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored enterprises (GSE’s) that sell, buy or insure most mortgages made in the U.S.

“We find little evidence that either the CRA or the GSE goals played a significant role in the subprime crisis,” Robert B. Avery and Kenneth P. Brevoort, senior economists with the Fed, wrote in the report, which was published in August. “In fact, the evidence suggests that loan outcomes may have been marginally better.”

In the stuffy world of economics papers, this one amounts to a throwdown, as the Fed essentially argues that those holding the opposing view of the crisis’s origins don’t know what they’re talking about.

“Many of the studies that argue that the CRA and GSE goals played a central role in precipitating the subprime crisis—as well as those papers that have argued against this view—have not relied on hard empirical evidence,” the Fed found. “However a more nuanced look at the data, as conducted in this paper, suggests that this superficial association may be misleading.”

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

The Fed looked at two types of data. One part compared loan performance in neighborhoods where CRA loans are required to similar neighborhoods where such loans are not required. The other part compared loans given to borrowers who barely qualified for coverage under the CRA and the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac requirements to loans to borrowers whose incomes fell barely above the requirements.

In both cases, delinquencies and foreclosures were no more common among people who received government-approved loans than they were for those who didn’t. In fact, the government requirements actually decreased the likelihood of loan failure for both borrowers and lenders.

“Our lender tests indicate that areas disproportionately served by lenders covered by the CRA experienced lower delinquency rates and less risky lending,” the Fed found.

The report does not go a step further to say what actually did cause the crash.

[Related article: Report-Since Everyone Caused the Crisis, No One is to Blame]

Image: morisius cosmonaut, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team