Home > 2011 > Credit Cards > Erply Enters Mobile Card Readers Market

Erply Enters Mobile Card Readers Market

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

There’s a new mobile credit card reader on the market, and this one is designed mostly for tablets like the iPad.

The latest device comes from Erply, a company based in Estonia that also makes software to manage inventory in stores. It costs $50 to buy the reader, plus $70 a month for small retailers, according to the company’s website. That’s slightly less than what is charged by Square, which also offers a card reader for mobile phones.

[Related article: Turn Your Phone Into a Credit Card Swiper]

Unlike Square, which plugs into the headphone jack of iPads and iPhones, Erply will connect using the iPad’s charger port. A new version of the Erply device will be ready for iPhones in three months, American Banker reports.

One reason why mobile payment devices like Square and Erply are proliferating is cost, Kris Hiiemaa, founder of Erply, tells the BBC.

“Small businesses can easily adopt tablets because of the very low price point,” Hiiemaa said. “A tablet starts from $500, compared to conventional cash registers that are PC-based starting from $2000, so it’s definitely much cheaper.”

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for fair credit?]

Image: www.erply.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.