Home > 2011 > Credit Cards

Consumer Advocate: Simple Phone Hack Exposes Credit Card History

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Using relatively simple techniques, hackers can tap into some banks’ automated telephone customer service lines and determine balances and account histories, according to an investigation by a prominent consumer advocate.

“The trouble with this system is that hackers, crooks, suspicious spouses, or nosy neighbors can access your credit card information using the same method the reporters from the British tabloid used to break into subjects’ voicemail accounts,” Edgar Dworsky, founder of ConsumerWorld.org, says in a press release. “This is far more serious, however, since consumers’ financial information and privacy are at risk.”

The investigation determined that two banks, Chase and Bank of America, have security vulnerabilities. Bank representatives disagree with Dworsky’s assessment, saying that even if hackers do compromise their systems, the thieves won’t get very far.

[Related article: On Cell Phone Hacking and Privacy: A Modest Proposal for Mr. Murdoch]

“In addition to at least two levels of authentication required to access what is very limited information over the automated voice system, we have additional security controls in place to detect potential abuse of the automated system,” says Betty Riess, a BofA spokeswoman.

Likewise, Chase says the risk of such an attack is “minimal,” according to a prepared statement by Chase spokeswoman Christine Holevas.

Dworsky teamed up with New York Times reporter Ron Lieber to test the security of the banks’ automated systems. Using just Lieber’s zip code and the last four digits of his credit card account numbers, Dworsky managed to enter the phone systems of both Chase and Bank of America. Chase granted Dworsky access every time he tried, whereas BofA occasionally denied him. See the Times story here.

At both banks, Dworsky was able to find the cardholder’s credit limit, account balance, recent payment history. Bank of America sometimes revealed specific merchants’ names where purchases were made.

[Featured Tool: Get your free Credit Report Card from Credit.com]

In both cases, the flaw is that the phone systems grant access with just the customers’ zip code and the last four digits of their account, both of which are easily obtained by thieves, either by rummaging through wastebaskets in retail stores or trash cans behind victims’ houses.

“It would be so simple for Chase and Bank of America to immediately require full account numbers when Visa and Mastercard cardholders access their system, and that would help thwart all but the most conniving of hackers,” Dworsky says. “Requiring a password would further enhance security too.”

But officials at Bank of America worry that adding too many hoops for customer authentication could provoke customer backlash.

“One of the top reasons customers use the automated system is because they want to quickly check account status and transaction information,” Riess said in a statement emailed to Credit.com. “Our objective is to balance customers’ need for convenience and quick access to general information with industry best protection of their accounts.”

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for good credit]

Image: Trace Meek, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team