Home > Credit Score > Case Dismissed? New Information on the FICO vs. VantageScore Lawsuit

Comments 0 Comments

VantageScore announced Wednesday that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a decision that rejected an appeal by FICO basically affirming all earlier decisions made in favor of VantageScore.

As background, in 2006 the three credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian and TransUnion) along with VantageScore Solutions released to market a new broad-based credit risk score called VantageScore that lenders could purchase to help them evaluate the future credit risk of prospects and customers.  Shortly thereafter, FICO filed a lawsuit claiming that the credit reporting agencies and VantageScore Solutions were engaging in unfair and competitive practices that could harm FICO.

[Infographic: How Much is Your FICO Score Costing You on Your Mortgage?]

In 2010, a U.S. district judge dismissed FICO’s claim of antitrust, false advertising and breach of contract, and the judge denied FICO’s motion for a new trial and ordered the cancellation of FICO’s trademark for its scoring range of 300 to 850 once FICO’s appeal concludes.

So what does all this mean for lenders and consumers in 2011 when credit dynamics, practices and the regulatory environment are so drastically different compared to 2006 when the lawsuit was originally filed?

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

From my perspective (and I’ll leave any legally focused review and assessment to others):

  • Fair competition is healthy for an industry as it often spurs innovation. Both FICO and VantageScore are committed to providing the industry with the most predictive credit scores, which will help lenders make better informed decisions to reduce risk which, in the long run, benefits the market as whole with more affordable credit.
  • Indirectly, the lawsuit has helped raise and increase awareness of credit scores for consumers, regulators and legislators.  As a result, there is a wealth of educational support materials and information available to consumers regarding credit scores, the important role they play in our daily lives and insights on how to improve them over time.
  • At the same time, there is more that can be done to increase score transparency for the consumer.  Many consumers are still confused as to what score they are getting when they purchase them directly from the various consumer websites and whether that score is the same score the lender is using to evaluate their application for credit.  The newly formed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has made consumer credit education a primary focus—including the issue of score brand transparency for the scores made available directly to consumers.  I am very interested to review and report out their findings.

Only the parties involved in the lawsuit can determine if this chapter of credit score history has come to an end.

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for excellent credit?]

Disclosure: Please note nothing in this post should be considered legal opinion or review.  In addition, Mr. Quinn was employed by FICO when the lawsuit was filed and through August 2010.

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team