Home > 2011 > Credit Cards > Bank of America Settles Allegations That it Rigged Credit Card Dispute System

Bank of America Settles Allegations That it Rigged Credit Card Dispute System

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

After a three-year legal battle, Bank of America has agreed to pay $5 million in fines for allegedly forcing consumers who were behind on their card payments to use a mandatory arbitration program that illegally favored the bank, according to an announcement this week by San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera.

The program, which is supposed to be as neutral as any court, decided in favor of consumers in 30 cases out of 18,000, or two-tenths of one percent, Herrera’s investigation found.

[Featured Product: Compare prepaid credit cards]

Bank of America said it settled to rid itself of the lingering financial uncertainty associated with the case. “This is an old matter, the suit was filed in March 2008,” Shirley Norton, a Bank of America spokeswoman, said in a prepared statement to Credit.com. “Bank of America discontinued the use of mandatory arbitration for consumer credit card agreements in August 2009.”

In the lawsuit, filed in 2008, Herrera alleged that Bank of America, its subsidiary FIA Card Services, and a Minnesota-based company called National Arbitration Forum (NAF) engaged in a myriad of deceptive and illegal practices that tipped the scales in favor of the bank. The companies failed to require that debt collectors prove a consumer had received notice of the arbitration practice, failed to honor consumers’ demands for hearings, and ignored evidence and arguments submitted by consumers.

[Fraud Resource: Free Identity Risk Score and personal risk profile]

The companies also allegedly forced consumers to pay inflated bills to cover Bank of America’s legal costs, and used lawyers who were suspended or otherwise ineligible to practice law in California, according to the lawsuit.

“When arbitration is fair and impartial, it can hold significant benefits in terms of efficiency and access to justice,” Herrera said. “But the evidence is clear that NAF is anything but fair or impartial. It is little more than a collection agent masquerading as a neutral party.”

In the settlement, Bank of America and its subsidiary did not admit guilt. FIA agreed to pay $5 million in fines to the city of San Francisco, and agreed not to arbitrate credit card debt disputes in California for two years. The company also agreed not to contract with National Arbitration Forum for the next five years. The settlement leaves open the possibility for victims to bring a class-action lawsuit against FIA.

Perhaps the most important change came in August 2009, a year after Herrera filed his lawsuit, when Bank of America announced it would no longer require consumers with credit card disputes to enter binding arbitration rather than pursue lawsuits in actual courts, according to a press release by Herrera’s office. Herrera said he is still pursuing his suit against National Arbitration Forum to try to win further financial penalties against the company.

[Related article: Congressional Lawmakers Introduce Arbitration Fairness Act]

Image: Alex Proimos, via Flickr.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.jordanfogal.com Jordan Fogal

    Banks have used arbitration as a threat and a club, Just as all other big businesses do. We no longer have seventh amendment rights. We the people, in the words of John Adams,:” with out the fortification of a trial by jury, we shall be ridden like horses , worked like cattle, fleeced like sheep and fed and clothed like swine”. And that is our world. Consumers with no consumer protection, not even the DTPA will help and the BBB is also under the thumb of big business, and their threats. They will pull out of the BBB if they are interferred with… want examples go to the great state of TX and then see the cancer that has spread across this nation. Please read my congressional tesimony, the effects of arbitration on the consumer……
    Jordan Fogal
    Jfogal281@aol.com
    http://www.jordanfogal.com
    http://www.jordanfogal.com
    http://www.jordanfogal.com

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.