Home > 2011 > Mortgages

To Save Mortgages, Should We Share Them?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

It’s been almost five years since the housing bubble burst. And still the long sought-after recovery is nowhere in sight. Nearly 11 million households owe more on their mortgages than their houses are worth.

Lenders foreclosed on more than 680,000 homes in the first three months of 2011, according to RealtyTrac. Yet banks remain so overwhelmed by the tide of failed loans that three of the largest ones recently failed out of the federal loan modification program (which itself has helped only a small fraction of needy families avoid foreclosure).

In this environment, it’s understandable that frustrated homeowners and lenders might ask: Isn’t there some way out of this? And isn’t there some way to make sure a crisis like this never happens again?

“The crisis has been dealt with very badly,” says Andrew Caplin, an economics professor at New York University. “Every single policy has pushed people further away from re-entering the U.S. lending market.”

Caplin thinks he has an answer. In fact, he’s been talking about it since 1995. It’s called the “shared appreciation mortgage.” The idea is to encourage banks to lower homeowners’ monthly payments by letting them share in the home’s rising value over time. In exchange for lowering the homeowners’ interest rates and/or principal, lenders get more assurance that the loan will eventually be repaid plus an equity stake in the home, which they can redeem when the home is eventually sold. (Credit.com’s Adam Levin wrote about shared appreciation mortgages in a recent column, Play It Again, SAM.)

Caplin thinks the shared appreciation mortgage is the perfect tool to lead us out of the current mess. He also thinks it could eventually replace the 30-year mortgage as America’s loan of choice.

Sounds simple right? Well, not exactly. While technically legal, shared appreciation mortgages have never caught on, due partly to an arcane IRS ruling from 1983 that, for all practical purposes, bans them.

“Get rid of the tax barrier and you could actually implement this today,” Caplin says.

Others think that’s not such a great idea. They see shared appreciation mortgages as potentially helpful in helping current homeowners make their loans more affordable. But as a replacement for 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages, which over the last 75 years have played a huge role in building the wealth of the American middle class?

Skeptics say that’s taking a good idea and pushing it too far.

“I do think it has some potential merit,” Barry Zigas, director of housing policy at the Consumer Federation of America, says of shared appreciation mortgages.  “But to say these things should replace the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage? I think it’s a big leap.”

[Identity Theft: Free Identity Risk Score and profile from Credit.com]

Image: Aidan Jones, via Flickr.com

One Loan, Two Uses »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team